Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36117575›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of medical sciences2022

Automated Lung Segmentation from Computed Tomography Images of Normal and COVID-19 Pneumonia Patients.

Faeze Gholamiankhah, Samaneh Mostafapour, Nouraddin Abdi Goushbolagh, Seyedjafar Shojaerazavi, Parvaneh Layegh, Seyyed Mohammad Tabatabaei, Hossein Arabi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of medical sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [Lung parenchyma segmentation based on double scale parallel attention network].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Faeze GholamiankhahDepartment of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Samaneh MostafapourDepartment of Radiology Technology, School of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Nouraddin Abdi GoushbolaghDepartment of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Seyedjafar ShojaerazaviDepartment of Cardiology, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Parvaneh LayeghDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Seyyed Mohammad TabatabaeiDepartment of Medical Informatics, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Hossein ArabiDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Automated image segmentation is an essential step in quantitative image analysis. This study assesses the performance of a deep learning-based model for lung segmentation from computed tomography (CT) images of normal and COVID-19 patients. Methods: A descriptive-analytical study was conducted from December 2020 to April 2021 on the CT images of patients from various educational hospitals affiliated with Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (Mashhad, Iran). Of the selected images and corresponding lung masks of 1,200 confirmed COVID-19 patients, 1,080 were used to train a residual neural network. The performance of the residual network (ResNet) model was evaluated on two distinct external test datasets, namely the remaining 120 COVID-19 and 120 normal patients. Different evaluation metrics such as Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean absolute error (MAE), relative mean Hounsfield unit (HU) difference, and relative volume difference were calculated to assess the accuracy of the predicted lung masks. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess the difference between the corresponding values in the normal and COVID-19 patients. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The ResNet model achieved a DSC of 0.980 and 0.971 and a relative mean HU difference of -2.679% and -4.403% for the normal and COVID-19 patients, respectively. Comparable performance in lung segmentation of normal and COVID-19 patients indicated the model's accuracy for identifying lung tissue in the presence of COVID-19-associated infections. Although a slightly better performance was observed in normal patients. Conclusion: The ResNet model provides an accurate and reliable automated lung segmentation of COVID-19 infected lung tissue.A preprint version of this article was published on arXiv before formal peer review (https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.02042).

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansLungNeural Networks, ComputerThoraxTomography, X-Ray ComputedComputed tomographyComputer-assistedCOVID-19Deep learningImage processingLungX-ray

Identifiers

PMID36117575
PMCPMC9445870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.