ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022
Delayed presentation of a huge abdominopelvic mass during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Giant Ovarian Tumors in Young Women: Diagnostic and Treatment Challenges-A Report of Two Cases and Narrative Review of the Recent Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Giant ovarian cysts are rare in developed countries due to advanced achievements in medical diagnostics. However, in the midst of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, patients with non-COVID-19-related illnesses tend to delay their health-seeking attention; thus, they had presented late. Case presentation: A 25-year-old single lady complained of a 3-month worsening abdominal pain and distention. She was initially well but neglected the symptoms due to the COVID-19 situation, yet came to our attention after she developed obstructive symptoms. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen revealed a huge cystic lesion from the pelvic area, which later was found to be from the right ovary upon urgent laparotomy exploration. The histopathological examination was consistent with mucinous cystadenoma of the ovary. Discussion: Acute non-COVID-19-related emergencies have decreased, as evidenced by reduced visits to the Emergency Department, and the number of abdominal CT scans. An emergency case like a huge abdominopelvic mass deserves an extensive radiologic examination as clinical assessment alone may not be adequate. Preoperative CT is superior to ultrasonography in getting the extent of the lesion, local infiltration, staging purpose, and surgical intervention. Pathology with a variety of spectrums such as mucinous neoplasm deserves to be investigated, evaluated, and resected even during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion: A giant abdominopelvic cystic mass can present emergency havoc during the COVID-19 pandemic. Urgent surgical intervention is mandatory by using full protection and exercising extreme precaution, regardless of the preoperative screening to avoid unnecessary viral transmissions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.