Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36116866›Full record

ArticleApplied nursing research : ANR2022

Association of enteral feeding with microaspiration in critically ill adults.

Annette M Bourgault, Rui Xie, Steven Talbert, Mary Lou Sole

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied nursing research : ANR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Use of Machine Learning Models to Predict Microaspiration Measured by Tracheal Pepsin A.American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses · 2025
    Article
  5. Nutritional care in patients undergoing laparoscopic/minimally invasive surgeries for gastrointestinal tumours.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Annette M BourgaultUniversity of Central Florida, College of Nursing, USA. Electronic address: annette.bourgault@ucf.edu.
Rui XieUniversity of Central Florida, Statistics and Data Science, USA.
Steven TalbertUniversity of Central Florida, College of Nursing, USA.
Mary Lou SoleUniversity of Central Florida, College of Nursing, USA.
University of Central Florida · USCollege of Central Florida · US

Funding

Oral Suction Intervention to Reduce Aspiration and Ventilator Events: NO-ASPIRATER01NR014508 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA · PI SOLE, MARY LOU · 2014 to 2017
$2.3M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR014508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study explored relationships between enteral feeding and tracheal pepsin A.

backgroundMechanically ventilated (MV) patients receiving enteral feeding are at risk for microaspiration. Tracheal pepsin A, an enzyme specific to gastric cells, was a proxy for microaspiration of gastric secretions.

methodsSecondary analysis of RCT data from critically ill, MV adults was conducted. Microaspiration prevention included elevated head of bed, endotracheal tube cuff pressure management, and regular oral care. Tracheal secretions for pepsin A were collected every 12 h. Microaspiration was defined as pepsin A ≥ 6.25 ng/mL. Positive pepsin A in >30 % of individual tracheal samples was defined as abundant microaspiration (frequent aspirator). Chi-squared, Fisher's Exact test, and generalized linear model (GLM) were used.

resultsTracheal pepsin A was present in 111/283 (39 %) mechanically ventilated patients and 48 (17 %) had abundant microaspiration. Enteral feeding was associated with tracheal pepsin A, which occurred within 24 h of enteral feeding. Of the patients who aspirated, the majority received some enteral feeding 96/111 (86 %), compared to only 15/111 (14 %) who received no feeding. A greater number of positive pepsin A events occurred with post-pyloric feeding tube location (55.6 %) vs. gastric (48.6 %), although significant only at the event-level. Frequent aspirators (abundant pepsin A) had higher pepsin A levels compared to infrequent aspirators.

conclusionsOur findings confirmed the stomach as the microaspiration source. Contrary to other studies, distal feeding tube location did not mitigate microaspiration. Timing for first positive pepsin A should be studied for possible association with enteral feeding intolerance.

Indexed as

Bodily SecretionsCritical IllnessEnteral NutritionPepsin ARespiratory Aspiration of Gastric ContentsTracheaAdultHumansInfant, NewbornIntubation, IntratrachealPepsin ACritical careEnteral feedingMechanical ventilationMicroaspirationPepsin A

Identifiers

PMID36116866
PMCPMC9529068
OpenAlexW4283777365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.