ReviewClinics in chest medicine2022
COVID-19 and the Transformation of Intensive Care Unit Telemedicine.
Review in Clinics in chest medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Vigilance Gradient: Nine Years of Adverse Event Trends in Pediatric Critical Care.Critical care explorations · 2026Observational
- Innovation, Technology, and Telemedicine in Critical Care.Critical care clinics · 2026Review
- The Utility of Automated, Data-Driven Clinical Support in Telemedicine for Critical Illness: A Survey-Based Study.Critical care explorations · 2026Article
- Structural models for spreading and scaling digital health initiatives: A scoping review protocol.PloS one · 2026Article
- Transforming critical care: the digital revolution's impact on intensive care units.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
- Improving rural intensive care infrastructure in the USA.The Lancet. Respiratory medicine · 2024Article
- Clinical Informatics in Critical Care Medicine.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2023Review
- Integrating a Virtual ICU with Cardiac and Cardiovascular ICUs: Managing the Needs of a Complex and High-Acuity Specialty ICU Cohort.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The concept of telecritical care has evolved over several decades. ICU Telemedicine providers using both the hub-and-spoke ICU telemedicine center and consultative service delivery models offered their services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemedicine center responses were more efficient, timely, and widely used than those of the consultative model. Bedside nurses, physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and respiratory therapists incorporated the use of ICU telemedicine tools into their practices and more frequently requested critical care specialist telemedicine support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.