ArticleNeuroImage2022
Understanding transformation tolerant visual object representations in the human brain and convolutional neural networks.
Article in NeuroImage, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mod-SE(2): a geometric deep learning framework for brain tumor classification and segmentation in MRI images.Journal of biomedical science · 2026Article
- Using fMRI Representations of Single Objects to Predict Multiple Objects in Working Memory in Human Occipitotemporal and Posterior Parietal Cortices.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Transformed Visual Working Memory Representations in Human Occipitotemporal and Posterior Parietal Cortices.eNeuro · 2025Article
- Interactive shape and color representation in visual working memory for colored objects in the human occipitotemporal cortex.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Inferring shape transformations in a drawing task.Memory & cognition · 2025Article
- The human posterior parietal cortices orthogonalize the representation of different streams of information concurrently coded in visual working memory.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Using fMRI to examine nonlinear mixed selectivity tuning to task and category in the human brain.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Multiple visual objects are represented differently in the human brain and convolutional neural networks.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Comparing the Dominance of Color and Form Information across the Human Ventral Visual Pathway and Convolutional Neural Networks.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2023Article
- When will AI misclassify? Intuiting failures on natural images.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- Representing Multiple Visual Objects in the Human Brain and Convolutional Neural Networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Limits to visual representational correspondence between convolutional neural networks and the human brain.Nature communications · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Forming transformation-tolerant object representations is critical to high-level primate vision. Despite its significance, many details of tolerance in the human brain remain unknown. Likewise, despite the ability of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to exhibit human-like object categorization performance, whether CNNs form tolerance similar to that of the human brain is unknown. Here we provide the first comprehensive documentation and comparison of three tolerance measures in the human brain and CNNs. We measured fMRI responses from human ventral visual areas to real-world objects across both Euclidean and non-Euclidean feature changes. In single fMRI voxels in higher visual areas, we observed robust object response rank-order preservation across feature changes. This is indicative of functional smoothness in tolerance at the fMRI meso-scale level that has never been reported before. At the voxel population level, we found highly consistent object representational structure across feature changes towards the end of ventral processing. Rank-order preservation, consistency, and a third tolerance measure, cross-decoding success (i.e., a linear classifier's ability to generalize performance across feature changes) showed an overall tight coupling. These tolerance measures were in general lower for Euclidean than non-Euclidean feature changes in lower visual areas, but increased over the course of ventral processing for all feature changes. These characteristics of tolerance, however, were absent in eight CNNs pretrained with ImageNet images with varying network architecture, depth, the presence/absence of recurrent processing, or whether a network was pretrained with the original or stylized ImageNet images that encouraged shape processing. CNNs do not appear to develop the same kind of tolerance as the human brain over the course of visual processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.