Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36116617›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2022

Understanding transformation tolerant visual object representations in the human brain and convolutional neural networks.

Yaoda Xu, Maryam Vaziri-Pashkam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yaoda XuPsychology Department, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. Electronic address: xucogneuro@gmail.com.
Maryam Vaziri-PashkamNational Institute of Mental Health, Rockville, MD 20857, USA.

Funding

Functional Anatomy Of Perceptual and Attentional Systems in the Primate BrainZIAMH002035 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI UNGERLEIDER, LESLIE G · 2009 to 2021
$13.9M
FUNCTIONAL ANATOMY OF PERCEPTUAL AND MEMORY SYSTEMS IN THE PRIMATE BRAINZ01MH002035 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI UNGERLEIDER, LESLIE G · 1985 to 2008
$7.0M
Adaptive visual representation in human posterior parietal cortexR01EY030854 · NEI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI YAODA XU · 2020 to 2026
$3.1M
Representing object ensembles in the human brain: Where, when and whatR01EY022355 · NEI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI XU, YAODA · 2012 to 2014
$1.2M
Nuclear Receptor Co-Activators and Brain Sex DifferencesK01MH002035 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI AUGER, ANTHONY P · 2001 to 2005
$728k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 MH002035Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002035NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022355NEI NIH HHS R01 EY030854NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH002035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forming transformation-tolerant object representations is critical to high-level primate vision. Despite its significance, many details of tolerance in the human brain remain unknown. Likewise, despite the ability of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to exhibit human-like object categorization performance, whether CNNs form tolerance similar to that of the human brain is unknown. Here we provide the first comprehensive documentation and comparison of three tolerance measures in the human brain and CNNs. We measured fMRI responses from human ventral visual areas to real-world objects across both Euclidean and non-Euclidean feature changes. In single fMRI voxels in higher visual areas, we observed robust object response rank-order preservation across feature changes. This is indicative of functional smoothness in tolerance at the fMRI meso-scale level that has never been reported before. At the voxel population level, we found highly consistent object representational structure across feature changes towards the end of ventral processing. Rank-order preservation, consistency, and a third tolerance measure, cross-decoding success (i.e., a linear classifier's ability to generalize performance across feature changes) showed an overall tight coupling. These tolerance measures were in general lower for Euclidean than non-Euclidean feature changes in lower visual areas, but increased over the course of ventral processing for all feature changes. These characteristics of tolerance, however, were absent in eight CNNs pretrained with ImageNet images with varying network architecture, depth, the presence/absence of recurrent processing, or whether a network was pretrained with the original or stylized ImageNet images that encouraged shape processing. CNNs do not appear to develop the same kind of tolerance as the human brain over the course of visual processing.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerPattern Recognition, VisualAnimalsBrainBrain MappingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingVisual PerceptionConvolutional neural networksfMRIRepresentational similarityToleranceVisual object representation

Identifiers

PMID36116617
PMCPMC11283825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.