Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36116363›Full record

ReviewEnvironment international2022

Silicone wristbands as personal passive sampling devices: Current knowledge, recommendations for use, and future directions.

Samantha M Samon, Stephanie C Hammel, Heather M Stapleton, Kim A Anderson

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environment international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Characterizing variability in personal chemical exposure to improve exposomics.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Silicone Wristbands for Measuring Human Exposure to Organic Chemicals: Uses and Benefits for Human Biological Research.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. An Assessment of Multipollutant Exposures Using Silicone Wristbands Among Bangladeshi Youth.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Samantha M SamonDepartment of Environmental & Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States.
Stephanie C HammelThe National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Heather M StapletonNicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Kim A AndersonDepartment of Environmental & Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States. Electronic address: kim.anderson@oregonstate.edu.
Oregon State University · USDuke University · USNational Research Centre for the Working Environment · DK

Funding

Research Experience and Training Coordination CoreP42ES016465 · NIEHS · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Robyn L Tanguay · 2009 to 2026
$52.5M
Reducing Susceptibility to Environmental Stress Throughout the Life SpanP30ES000210 · NIEHS · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BECKMAN, JOSEPH S · 1985 to 2015
$21.4M
MODE OF ACTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICANTST32ES007060 · NIEHS · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Jamie DeWitt, Siva Kumar Kolluri · 1985 to 2026
$11.6M
Zebrafish Biomedical Research Facility CoreP30ES030287 · NIEHS · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Molly L Kile · 2020 to 2026
$9.8M
Research CoreU2CES030851 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI STAPLETON, HEATHER M · 2019 to 2025
$6.0M
Hurricane Harvey DR2: Individual Chemical Exposure AssessmentsR21ES029460 · NIEHS · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERSON, KIM A. · 2018 to 2019
$420k
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES000210NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES030287NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES016465NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES029460NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007060NIEHS NIH HHS U2C ES030851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Personal chemical exposure assessment is necessary to determine the frequency and magnitude of individual chemical exposures, especially since chemicals present in everyday environments may lead to adverse health outcomes. In the last decade, silicone wristbands have emerged as a new chemical exposure assessment tool and have since been utilized for assessing personal exposure to a wide range of chemicals in a variety of populations. Silicone wristbands can be powerful tools for quantifying personal exposure to chemical mixtures in a single sample, associating exposure with health outcomes, and potentially overcoming some of the challenges associated with quantifying the chemical exposome. However, as their popularity grows, it is crucial that they are used in the appropriate context and within the limits of the technology. This review serves as a guide for researchers interested in utilizing silicone wristbands as a personal exposure assessment tool. Along with briefly discussing the passive sampling theory behind silicone wristbands, this review performs an in-depth comparison of wristbands to other common exposure assessment tools, including biomarkers of exposure measured in biospecimens, and evaluates their utility in exposure assessments and epidemiological studies. Finally, this review includes recommendations for utilizing silicone wristbands to evaluate personal chemical exposure and provides suggestions on what research is needed to recognize silicone wristbands as a premier chemical exposure assessment tool.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringSiliconesBiomarkersKnowledgeBiomarkersSiliconesExposomeHuman exposurePassive samplingPersonal exposure assessmentSilicone wristbands

Identifiers

PMID36116363
PMCPMC9713950
OpenAlexW4282966282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.