Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36116303›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2022

Rare case of rectal perforation by an intrauterine device: Case report and review of the literature.

Reem Boushehry, Talal Al-Taweel, Asya Bandar, Maryam Hasan, Mario Atnuos, Ahmed Alkhamis

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Endoscopic Retrieval of Migrated Uterine Device: Case Report.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Reem BoushehryDepartment of Surgery, Al-Adan Hospital, Kuwait. Electronic address: reem.boushehry@gmail.com.
Talal Al-TaweelDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jaber Al-Ahmad Hospital, Kuwait.
Asya BandarObstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Jaber Al-Ahmad Hospital, Kuwait.
Maryam HasanDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jaber Al-Ahmad Hospital, Kuwait.
Mario AtnuosDepartment of Surgery, Jaber Al-Ahmad Hospital, Kuwait.
Ahmed AlkhamisDepartment of Surgery, Jaber Al-Ahmad Hospital, Kuwait; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait.
Adan Hospital · KWKuwait University · KW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and importanceIntrauterine devices (IUDs) are safe, highly effective and reversible forms of contraception. Reliance on IUD has been increasing and as such, it is the responsibility of the healthcare provider to be aware of the complications associated with it. IUD rectal migration is one of the rare but serious complications that may lead to detrimental sequelae. CASE PRESENTATION: A 30-year-old asymptomatic woman presented to the gynaecology clinic two months after a difficult insertion of an IUD. On examination, the device was not localised in utero with transvaginal sonography. Computed tomography scan and colonoscopy revealed the position of the IUD within the rectum. It was successfully retrieved with a combined laparoscopic-colonoscopic approach. Follow-up flexible sigmoidoscopy showed a well-healed rectal wall. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: IUD perforation can increase the risk of morbidity and necessitates early surgical intervention even if the patient is asymptomatic. Combined laparoscopic-colonoscopic approach allows for safe retrieval of IUD that has perforated the intraperitoneal rectal segment or is firmly embedded within the mucosa. Recognising the risk factors and adhering to the principles of IUD insertion could significantly lower the risk of perforation.

conclusionThis case report highlights the importance of a physician's vigilance regarding a perforating IUD in a patient with a history of a difficult insertion. It is imperative to undertake additional steps to rule out such a complication in these cases. Uterine perforation can be avoided with implementation of safe IUD insertion practice.

Indexed as

Case reportIntrauterine contraceptive deviceIntrauterine device migrationIntrauterine perforationLaparoscopyRectal perforation

Identifiers

PMID36116303
PMCPMC9568710
OpenAlexW4295012030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.