Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36116093›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2022

Reproductive history differs by molecular subtypes of breast cancer among women aged ≤ 50 years in Scotland diagnosed 2009-2016: a cross-sectional study.

Anushri Chitkara, Ines Mesa-Eguiagaray, Sarah H Wild, Peter S Hall, David A Cameron, Andrew H Sims, Jonine D Figueroa

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anushri ChitkaraUsher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK.
Ines Mesa-EguiagarayUsher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK.
Sarah H WildUsher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK.
Peter S HallUsher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK.
David A CameronUsher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK.
Andrew H SimsCancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.
Jonine D FigueroaUsher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK. jonine.figueroa@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5100-623X
Edinburgh Cancer Research · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 207800/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aetiology of breast cancers diagnosed ≤ 50 years of age remains unclear. We aimed to compare reproductive risk factors between molecular subtypes of breast cancer, thereby suggesting possible aetiologic clues, using routinely collected cancer registry and maternity data in Scotland.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study of 4108 women aged ≤ 50 years with primary breast cancer diagnosed between 2009 and 2016 linked to maternity data. Molecular subtypes of breast cancer were defined using immunohistochemistry (IHC) tumour markers, oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2), and tumour grade. Age-adjusted polytomous logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association of number of births, age at first birth and time since last birth with IHC-defined breast cancer subtypes. Luminal A-like was the reference compared to luminal B-like (HER2-), luminal B-like (HER2+), HER2-overexpressed and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

resultsMean (SD) for number of births, age at first birth and time since last birth was 1.4 (1.2) births, 27.2 (6.1) years and 11.0 (6.8) years, respectively. Luminal A-like was the most common subtype (40%), while HER2-overexpressed and TNBC represented 5% and 15% of cases, respectively. Larger numbers of births were recorded among women with HER2-overexpressed and TNBC compared with luminal A-like tumours (> 3 vs 0 births, OR 1.87, 95%CI 1.18-2.96; OR 1.44, 95%CI 1.07-1.94, respectively). Women with their most recent birth > 10 years compared to < 2 years were less likely to have TNBC tumours compared to luminal A-like (OR 0.63, 95%CI 0.41-0.97). We found limited evidence for differences by subtype with age at first birth.

conclusionNumber of births and time since last birth differed by molecular subtypes of breast cancer among women aged ≤ 50 years. Analyses using linked routine electronic medical records by molecularly defined tumour pathology data can be used to investigate the aetiology and prognosis of cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCross-Sectional StudiesErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneReproductive HistoryBiomarkers, TumorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneAge at first birthBreast cancerER statusHER2Molecular subtypesParityReproductive factorsTime since last birth

Identifiers

PMID36116093
PMCPMC9581868
OpenAlexW4296248977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.