Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36115938›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2022

AbdomenNet: deep neural network for abdominal organ segmentation in epidemiologic imaging studies.

Anne-Marie Rickmann, Jyotirmay Senapati, Oksana Kovalenko, Annette Peters, Fabian Bamberg, Christian Wachinger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Imaging: A Systematic Review.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anne-Marie RickmannLab for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging, Department of Medicine, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany. arickman@med.lmu.de.
Jyotirmay SenapatiLab for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging, Department of Medicine, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Oksana KovalenkoLab for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Annette PetersInstitute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Munich, Germany.
Fabian BambergDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Christian WachingerLab for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging, Department of Medicine, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DETechnical University of Munich · DEHelmholtz Zentrum München · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DE

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhole-body imaging has recently been added to large-scale epidemiological studies providing novel opportunities for investigating abdominal organs. However, the segmentation of these organs is required beforehand, which is time consuming, particularly on such a large scale.

methodsWe introduce AbdomentNet, a deep neural network for the automated segmentation of abdominal organs on two-point Dixon MRI scans. A pre-processing pipeline enables to process MRI scans from different imaging studies, namely the German National Cohort, UK Biobank, and Kohorte im Raum Augsburg. We chose a total of 61 MRI scans across the three studies for training an ensemble of segmentation networks, which segment eight abdominal organs. Our network presents a novel combination of octave convolutions and squeeze and excitation layers, as well as training with stochastic weight averaging.

resultsOur experiments demonstrate that it is beneficial to combine data from different imaging studies to train deep neural networks in contrast to training separate networks. Combining the water and opposed-phase contrasts of the Dixon sequence as input channels, yields the highest segmentation accuracy, compared to single contrast inputs. The mean Dice similarity coefficient is above 0.9 for larger organs liver, spleen, and kidneys, and 0.71 and 0.74 for gallbladder and pancreas, respectively.

conclusionsOur fully automated pipeline provides high-quality segmentations of abdominal organs across population studies. In contrast, a network that is only trained on a single dataset does not generalize well to other datasets.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerAbdomenCohort StudiesHumansWaterWaterAbdominal MRIDeep learningDixon MRISegmentation

Identifiers

PMID36115938
PMCPMC9482195
OpenAlexW4296120535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.