Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36115842›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Rural-urban disparities in caesarean deliveries in sub-Saharan Africa: a multivariate non-linear decomposition modelling of Demographic and Health Survey data.

Bright Opoku Ahinkorah, Richard Gyan Aboagye, Abdul-Aziz Seidu, Joshua Okyere, Aliu Mohammed, Vijay Kumar Chattu, Eugene Budu, Faustina Adoboi, Sanni Yaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bright Opoku AhinkorahSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Richard Gyan AboagyeDepartment of Family and Community Health, Fred N. Binka School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Hohoe, Ghana.
Abdul-Aziz SeiduCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Joshua OkyereDepartment of Population and Health, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana. joshuaokyere54@gmail.com.
Aliu MohammedDepartment of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Vijay Kumar ChattuDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, Maharashtra, 442107, India.
Eugene BuduDepartment of Population and Health, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Faustina AdoboiCape Coast Nursing and Midwifery Training College, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Sanni YayaSchool of International Development and Global Studies, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGlobally, the rate of caesarean deliveries increased from approximately 16.0 million in 2000 to 29.7 million in 2015. In this study, we decomposed the rural-urban disparities in caesarean deliveries in sub-Saharan Africa.

methodsData for the study were extracted from the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys of twenty-eight countries in sub-Saharan Africa. We included 160,502 women who had delivered in health facilities within the five years preceding the survey. A multivariate non-linear decomposition model was employed to decompose the rural-urban disparities in caesarean deliveries. The results were presented using coefficients and percentages.

resultsThe pooled prevalence of caesarean deliveries in the 28 countries considered in the study was 6.04% (95% CI = 5.21-6.88). Caesarean deliveries' prevalence was highest in Namibia (16.05%; 95% CI = 14.06-18.04) and lowest in Chad (1.32%; 95% CI = 0.91-1.73). For rural-urban disparities in caesarean delivery, the pooled prevalence of caesarean delivery was higher in urban areas (10.37%; 95% CI = 8.99-11.75) than rural areas (3.78%; 95% CI = 3.17-4.39) across the 28 countries. Approximately 81% of the rural-urban disparities in caesarean deliveries were attributable to the differences in child and maternal characteristics. Hence, if the child and maternal characteristics were levelled, more than half of the rural-urban inequality in caesarean deliveries would be reduced. Wealth index (39.2%), antenatal care attendance (13.4%), parity (12.8%), mother's educational level (3.5%), and health insurance subscription (3.1%) explained approximately 72% of the rural-urban disparities in caesarean deliveries.

conclusionThis study shows significant rural-urban disparities in caesarean deliveries, with the disparities being attributable to the differences in child and maternal characteristics: wealth index, parity, antenatal care attendance, mother's educational level, and health insurance subscription. Policymakers in the included countries could focus and work on improving the socioeconomic status of rural-dwelling women as well as encouraging antenatal care attendance, women's education, health insurance subscription, and family planning, particularly in rural areas.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionRural PopulationAfrica South of the SaharaChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyPrevalenceCaesarean deliveriesDecomposition analysisGlobal healthSub-Saharan AfricaWomen

Identifiers

PMID36115842
PMCPMC9482294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.