Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36115680›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Parents' perspective on COVID-19 vaccine in children 6 months through 4 years: a cross-sectional study from Northwest Wisconsin.

Chetna Mangat, Jennifer Rich, Devang Sanghavi, Rebecca Schmidt, Natasa Milosavljevic, Tran Linh, Pankaj Bansal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Parental hesitancy for pediatric COVID-19 vaccines in Chile.Therapeutic advances in vaccines and immunotherapy · 2025
    Article
  2. COVID-19 Vaccines in the Pediatric Population: A Focus on Cardiac Patients.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chetna MangatDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, USA.
Jennifer RichDepartment of Research and Innovation, Mayo Clinic Health System, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, USA.
Devang SanghaviDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Rebecca SchmidtDepartment of Research and Innovation, Mayo Clinic Health System, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, USA.
Natasa MilosavljevicDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, USA.
Tran LinhDepartment of Research and Innovation, Mayo Clinic Health System, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, USA.
Pankaj BansalDepartment of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic Health System, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, USA bansal.pankaj@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6315-6879
Mayo Clinic Health System · USJacksonville College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination is critical to control the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, but despite the availability of safe and effective vaccine in children over 5 years, vaccination rates remain low. There is paucity of data about vaccine acceptance and factors influencing parents' hesitancy about the COVID-19 vaccine for young children. AIMS AND

objectivesTo estimate vaccine acceptance by parents of children 6 months through 4 years, and to evaluate the factors influencing vaccine hesitancy.

methodsElectronic survey was sent to parents of children 6 months through 4 years through an online portal account at Mayo Clinic Health System, Northwest-Wisconsin. Data were captured via Research Electronic Data Capture secured data collection software. Bivariate and multivariate regression was used to determine most pertinent factors influencing parents' decisions against the outcome, 'Intent to Vaccinate'.

results39.7% of the parents were 'very likely' or 'somewhat likely

conclusionsVaccine hesitancy remains a major issue regarding uptake of the upcoming COVID-19 vaccine. Strong and clear evidence-based recommendations from primary care provider and more information from trusted websites such as Centers for Disease Control and Prevention can decrease vaccine hesitancy in parents. Further research targeted at understanding beliefs and perspectives of parents from different demographics can assist policy-makers in implementing measures to improve vaccination rates in children and tailor our dialogue to match the needs of our patients and families.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesChildChild, PreschoolCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsParentsWisconsinCOVID-19 VaccinesInfluenza VaccinesCOVID-19paediatric infectious disease & immunisationpreventive medicine

Identifiers

PMID36115680
PMCPMC9485653
OpenAlexW4296178856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.