ReviewWorld neurosurgery2023
Major Genetic Motifs in Pituitary Adenomas: A Practical Literature Update.
Review in World neurosurgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel germline CDH23 variant as a likely cause of an ultra-giant prolactinoma.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Unlocking the Genetic Secrets of Acromegaly: Exploring the Role of Genetics in a Rare Disorder.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe literature includes many studies examining the genetic abnormalities that influence pituitary adenomas (PAs). We aimed to state the collective knowledge on the genetic underpinnings of PAs by organizing, summarizing, and consolidating the literature to serve as a comprehensive review for scientists and clinicians of the most up-to-date information underlying the genetic landscape of PAs.
methodsThe PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched using multiple key words and combined Medical Subject Headings terms; only articles published in English between January 2000 and January 2022 were included. Articles in which the focus did not relate to genetics, that included mainly anecdotal evidence, or that were single case studies were eliminated.
resultsPAs are one of the most common intracranial neoplasms. However, the genetic underpinnings for these tumors are not yet fully elucidated. There are several categories of PAs: clinically significant versus not clinically significant, functional versus nonfunctional, and germline-derived versus sporadic origin. Each of these disease subcategories is characterized by unique genetic aberrations. Recently, more genes and other types of genetic aberrations have been identified as possible causes of PAs, such as copy number variations and altered levels of microRNAs.
conclusionsThis review serves to consolidate and summarize the literature discussing the genetic motifs of PAs to help physicians and scientists deliver patient-centered therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.