ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2023
Minimally Invasive Surgery in the United States, 2022: Understanding Its Value Using New Datasets.
Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Individualised positive end-expiratory pressure to minimise driving pressure and postoperative pulmonary complications in minimally invasive thoracic and abdominal surgery a systematic review and meta-analysis.British journal of anaesthesia · 2026Pooled it
- Ruling the robot: a phase-based analysis of resident autonomy across core robotic general surgery procedures.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Intraoperative molecular imaging - it's all about advancing surgical decision making and improving dexterity.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026Review
- Alcohol Consumption Is a Risk Factor of Surgical Site Infection After Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Secondary Observational Analysis of a Clinical Trial.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
- The Revolution in Surgery That Saves Millions of Lives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Quantitative assessment of laparoscopic camera navigation skill: a retrospective cross-sectional study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Observational
- Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy with DEXTERSurgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Article
- Blurred vision, clear concern: linking poor visualization with adverse events in minimally invasive surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Review
- Audio-based event detection in the operating room.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024Article
- Establishment of a 24/7 robotic acute care surgery program at a large academic medical center.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Biocompatibility of Antifogging SiO-doped Diamond-Like Carbon Laparoscope Coatings.Applied surface science · 2023Article
- Global assessment of surgical skills (GASS): validation of a new instrument to measure global technical safety in surgical procedures.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Minimally invasive approach associated with lower resource utilization after aortic and mitral valve surgery.JTCVS open · 2023Article
- Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up Study of the LevaLap 1.0 during Laparoscopic Access.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionWhile minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has transformed the treatment landscape of surgical care, its utilization is not well understood. The newly released Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample allows for more accurate estimates of MIS volume in the United States-in combination with inpatient datasets. MATERIALS AND
methodsMultiple nationwide databases from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) were used: the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample and National Inpatient Sample. The volume of MIS and robotic procedures were calculated from 2016 to 2018. An online query system, HCUPNet, was queried for inpatient stays from 1993 to 2014.
resultsIn 2017, 9.8 million inpatient major operating room procedures were analyzed, of which 11.1% were MIS and 2.5% were robotic-assisted, compared with 9.6 million inpatient operating room procedures (11.2% MIS and 2.9% robotic-assisted) in 2018. There were 10.6, 10.6, and 10.7 million ambulatory procedures in 2016, 2017, and 2018, respectively. Ambulatory MIS procedures showed an increasing trend across years, representing 16.9%, 17.4%, and 18%, respectively. HCUPNet data revealed an increase in inpatient MIS cases from 529,811 (8.9%) in 1993 to 1,443,446 (20.7%) in 2014.
conclusionsThis study is the first to estimate national MIS volume across specialties in both inpatient and ambulatory hospital settings. We found a trend toward a higher proportion of MIS and robotic cases from 1997 to 2018. These data may help contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of MIS value within surgery and highlight limitations of current databases, especially when categorizing robotic cases on a national scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.