ArticleJournal of neurosurgery2023
Gene expression analysis during progression of malignant meningioma compared to benign meningioma.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel insights into meningioma brain invasion with spatial transcriptomic profiling.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2026Article
- Novel insights into hypoxia-driven transcriptomic and epigenetic landscapes in grade 3 meningioma.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Integrative bioinformatics analysis and elastic network modeling elucidate the role of cellular senescence in meningioma recurrence.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Near-Infrared Photoimmunotherapy in Brain Tumors-An Unexplored Frontier.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Malignant Transformation of Meningiomas.Journal of Cancer · 2025Review
- Flow Cytometry Analyses of Meningioma Immune Cell Composition Using a Short, Optimized Digestion Protocol.Cancers · 2024Article
- Meningioma: International Consortium on Meningiomas consensus review on scientific advances and treatment paradigms for clinicians, researchers, and patients.Neuro-oncology · 2024Review
- Frailty in intracranial meningioma resection: the risk analysis index demonstrates strong discrimination for predicting non-home discharge and in-hospital mortality.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2024Article
- Malignant Transformation of Meningioma WithBrain tumor research and treatment · 2024Article
- RACK1 Promotes Meningioma Progression by Activation of NF-κB Pathway via Preventing CSNK2B from Ubiquitination Degradation.Cancers · 2024Article
- Domestic Animal Models of Central Nervous System Tumors: Focus on Meningiomas.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Deciphering hepatocellular carcinoma pathogenesis and therapeutics: a study on anoikis, ceRNA regulatory network and traditional Chinese medicine.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveMeningioma is the most common primary intracranial neoplasm. Only 1%-3% of meningiomas are malignant according to the 2016 WHO criteria (WHO grade III). High-grade meningiomas present specific gene expression signatures indicating aggressive growth or recurrence. However, changes in gene expression and in neuroinflammatory gene expression signatures in WHO grade III meningiomas and during progression from WHO grade I or II to grade III are unknown.
methodsThe authors used a NanoString targeted gene expression panel with focus on 787 genes relevant in meningioma pathology and neuroinflammatory pathways to investigate patients with grade III meningiomas treated at Rigshospitalet from 2000 to 2020 (n = 51). A temporal dimension was added to the investigation by including samples from patients' earlier grade I and II meningiomas and grade III recurrences (n = 139 meningiomas). The authors investigated changes in neuroinflammatory gene expression signatures in 1) grade I meningiomas that later transformed into grade III meningiomas, and 2) grade III meningiomas compared with nonrecurrent grade I meningiomas.
resultsThe authors' data indicate that FOXM1, TOP2A, BIRC5, and MYBL2 were enriched and the HOTAIR regulatory pathway was enriched in grade III meningiomas compared with nonrecurrent grade I meningiomas. They discovered a separation of malignant and benign meningiomas based only on genes involved in microglia regulation with enrichment of P2RY12 in grade I compared with grade III meningiomas. Interestingly, FOXM1 was upregulated in premalignant grade I meningioma years before the grade III transformation.
conclusionsThe authors found gene expression changes in low-grade meningiomas that predated histological transformation to grade III meningiomas. Neuroinflammation genes distinguished grade III from grade I meningiomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.