Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36114948›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2022

Volumetric and connectivity assessment of the caudate nucleus in California sea lions and coyotes.

Peter F Cook, Gregory Berns

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Beyond the surface: howFrontiers in neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Description of the koala (Frontiers in neurology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peter F CookNew College of Florida, Sarasota, USA. pcook930@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8064-5217
Gregory BernsEmory University, Atlanta, USA.
Emory University · USNew College of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to a large (chimpanzee-sized) and heavily convoluted brain, one of the most striking neurobiological features in pinnipeds is the large size of the head of the caudate nucleus, which dwarfs the rest of the striatum. Although previous research has suggested carnivore striatum is small in comparison to that of primates, there are limited volumetric data on separate striatal structures in carnivores. Therefore, the apparent functional implication of a potentially hypertrophic caudate to carnivores has not been discussed. Here, for the first time, we obtained separate volumetric measurements of caudate and putamen in California sea lions and coyotes. Exemplars of both species had very large caudate nuclei, approximately 1/75th of total brain volume. In both the sea lion and coyote, the caudate dwarfed the putamen at a ratio of 13 to 1 or greater, a finding in strong contrast to measurements showing larger putamen than caudate in primates. In addition, using post-mortem diffusion tensor brain imaging, we mapped and compared white matter connections between the dorsal caudate and the motor, premotor and frontopolar, and orbitofrontal cortices in healthy adult sea lions and healthy adult coyotes. The sea lions showed some evidence of greater premotor and frontopolar connectivity. These findings bear on previously underexplored striatal characteristics of large carnivores, and we discuss potential interpretations related to cognitive flexibility and sensorimotor transformation.

Indexed as

CoyotesSea LionsAnimalsCaudate NucleusPrimatesPutamenBasal gangliaCaudateCoyoteDiffusion tensor imagingPutamenSea lion

Identifiers

PMID36114948
OpenAlexW4296139646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.