SynthesisNeurosurgical review2022
Combined application of neural stem/progenitor cells and scaffolds on locomotion recovery following spinal cord injury in rodents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combined PLGA scaffolds and therapeutic stem cells for locomotion recovery in spinal cord-injured rats: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Pooled it
- Stem cell therapy for locomotion recovery and neuropathic pain alleviation in spinal cord injury: an umbrella review and meta-analysis.Spinal cord · 2025Pooled it
- The Efficacy of Different Material Scaffold-Guided Cell Transplantation in the Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury in Rats: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy of growth factor gene-modified stem cells for motor function after spinal cord injury in rodents: a systematic review and meta‑analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2024Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis present study evaluates the pre-clinical evidence on the efficacy of NS/PC and scaffold (NS/PC + scaffold) transplantation on locomotor recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI).
methodTwo independent reviewers screened the records gathered through a systematic search in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Sciences databases. Studies on rats/mice evaluating the efficacy of simultaneous transplantation of NS/PCs and scaffold in the treatment of SCI were included. The results were reported as standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI).
resultsForty-seven articles were retrieved. Analyses showed that NS/PC + scaffold transplantation significantly improved locomotion in animals with SCI compared to that of the non-treatment group (SMD = 2.71, 95% CI: 1.89 to 3.54; I
conclusionThe findings showed that using NS/PCs with scaffold not only improves locomotion recovery, but also is superior to NS/PCs alone and scaffold alone. Future experiments and translational clinical studies are recommended to focus on the assessment of the safety and efficacy of the application of NS/PC + scaffold on SCI recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.