Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36114844›Full record

ArticleBiological cybernetics2022

Comparison of event-related modulation index and traditional methods for evaluating phase-amplitude coupling using simulated brain signals.

Chung-Chieh Tsai, Hong-Hsiang Liu, Yi-Li Tseng

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biological cybernetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chung-Chieh TsaiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Hong-Hsiang LiuInstitute of Statistical Science, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yi-Li TsengDepartment of Electrical Engineering, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. yilitseng@mail.nsysu.edu.tw.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 110-2222-E-110-007-MY2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The investigation of brain oscillations and connectivity has become an important topic in the recent decade. There are several types of interactions between neuronal oscillations, and one of the most interesting among these interactions is phase-amplitude coupling (PAC). Several methods have been proposed to measure the strength of PAC, including the phase-locking value, circular-linear correlation, and modulation index. In the current study, we compared these traditional PAC methods with simulated electroencephalogram signals. Further, to assess the PAC value at each time point, we also compared two recently established methods, event-related phase-locking value and event-related circular-linear correlation, with our newly proposed event-related modulation index (ERMI). Results indicated that the ERMI has better temporal resolution and is more tolerant to noise than the other two event-related methods, suggesting the advantages of utilizing ERMI in evaluating the strength of PAC within a brain region.

Indexed as

BrainModels, NeurologicalElectroencephalographyNeuronsEvent-related modulation indexEvent-related phase-amplitude couplingPhase-amplitude coupling

Identifiers

PMID36114844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.