Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36114839›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2022

Anaerobic work capacity in cycling: the effect of computational method.

Erik P Andersson, Philipp Bachl, Anna Schmuttermair, Craig A Staunton, Thomas L Stöggl

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erik P AnderssonSwedish Winter Sports Research Centre, Department of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden. erik.andersson@miun.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4433-1218
Philipp BachlSwedish Winter Sports Research Centre, Department of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden.
Anna SchmuttermairDepartment of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Craig A StauntonSwedish Winter Sports Research Centre, Department of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden.
Thomas L StögglDepartment of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.

Funding

Swedish National Centre for Research in Sports CIFSwedish National Centre for Research in Sports P2020-0157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the anaerobic work capacity (AnWC, i.e., attributable anaerobic mechanical work) assessed using four different approaches/models applied to time-trial (TT) cycle-ergometry exercise.

methodsFifteen male cyclists completed a 7 × 4-min submaximal protocol and a 3-min all-out TT (TT

resultsAverage PO during TT

conclusionThese findings demonstrate a substantial disagreement in AnWC between CP

Indexed as

Exercise TestOxygen ConsumptionAnaerobiosisBicyclingErgometryHumansMalePhysical EnduranceAll-out pacingMaximal accumulated oxygen deficit methodMetabolic demandReliabilitySupramaximal exerciseTime trial

Identifiers

PMID36114839
PMCPMC9613728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.