Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36114836›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2022

When running is easier than walking: effects of experience and gait on human obstacle traversal in virtual reality.

Florian Hofmann, Volker Dürr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Florian HofmannBiological Cybernetics, Faculty of Biology, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstr. 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0429-5793
Volker DürrBiological Cybernetics, Faculty of Biology, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstr. 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany. volker.duerr@uni-bielefeld.de.

Funding

Excellence Initiative of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft EXC277 (CITEC)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans readily traverse obstacles irrespective of whether they walk or run, despite strong differences between these gaits. Assuming that the control of human obstacle traversal may be either gait-specific or gait-independent, the present study investigates whether previous experience in an obstacle traversal task transfers between the two gaits, and, if this was the case, whether transfer worked both ways. To this end, we conducted a within-group comparison of kinematic adjustments during human obstacle traversal in both walking and running, with distinct participant groups for the two gait sequences. Participants (n = 12/12 (f/m), avg. 25 yo) were motion captured as they traversed obstacles at walking and running speeds on a treadmill, surrounded by an immersive virtual reality (VR) environment. We find that kinematics recorded in our VR setup are consistent with that obtained in real-world experiments. Comparison of learning curves reveals that participants are able to utilize previous experience and transfer learned adjustments from one gait to another. However, this transfer is not symmetrical, with previous experience during running leading to increased success rate in walking, but not the other way round. From a range of step parameters we identified lacking toe height of the trailing leg as the main cause for this asymmetry.

Indexed as

RunningVirtual RealityBiomechanical PhenomenaGaitHumansWalkingGaitHuman locomotionKinematicsObstacle

Identifiers

PMID36114836
PMCPMC9510118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.