Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36114747›Full record

ArticleCancer science2023

Survival prediction of stomach cancer using expression data and deep learning models with histopathological images.

Ting Wei, Xin Yuan, Ruitian Gao, Luke Johnston, Jie Zhou, Yifan Wang, Weiming Kong, Yujing Xie, Yue Zhang, Dakang Xu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The consensus molecular subtypes of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ting WeiDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Xin YuanDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Ruitian GaoDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Luke JohnstonSJTU-Yale Joint Centre for Biostatistics and Data Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jie ZhouSJTU-Yale Joint Centre for Biostatistics and Data Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yifan WangDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Weiming KongInstitute of Transactional Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yujing XieSJTU-Yale Joint Centre for Biostatistics and Data Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yue ZhangDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Dakang XuFaculty of Medical Laboratory Science, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Zhangsheng YuDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8189-5330

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 11671256Shanghai Jiao Tong University STAR Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately predicting patient survival is essential for cancer treatment decision. However, the prognostic prediction model based on histopathological images of stomach cancer patients is still yet to be developed. We propose a deep learning-based model (MultiDeepCox-SC) that predicts overall survival in patients with stomach cancer by integrating histopathological images, clinical data, and gene expression data. The MultiDeepCox-SC not only automatedly selects patches with more information for survival prediction, without manual labeling for histopathological images, but also identifies genetic and clinical risk factors associated with survival in stomach cancer. The prognostic accuracy of the MultiDeepCox-SC (C-index = 0.744) surpasses the result only based on histopathological image (C-index = 0.660). The risk score of our model was still an independent predictor of survival outcome after adjustment for potential confounders, including pathologic stage, grade, age, race, and gender on The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset (hazard ratio 1.555, p = 3.53e-08) and the external test set (hazard ratio 2.912, p = 9.42e-4). Our fully automated online prognostic tool based on histopathological images, clinical data, and gene expression data could be utilized to improve pathologists' efficiency and accuracy (https://yu.life.sjtu.edu.cn/DeepCoxSC).

Indexed as

Deep LearningStomach NeoplasmsHumansPrognosisRisk Factorsmultiomicspathologyprognosticstomach cancersurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID36114747
PMCPMC9899622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.