Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36114712›Full record

ReviewDementia (London, England)2022

Peer support for people living with rare or young onset dementia: An integrative review.

Mary Pat Sullivan, Veronika Williams, Adetola Grillo, Roberta McKee-Jackson, Paul M Camic, Gill Windle, Joshua Stott, Emily Brotherhood, Sebastian J Crutch, Rare Dementia Support (RDS) research team

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dementia (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Adaptation of an eHealth Intervention: iSupport for Carers of People with Rare Dementias.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mary Pat SullivanFaculty of Education and Professional Studies, 6057Nipissing University, North Bay, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9514-0783
Veronika WilliamsFaculty of Education and Professional Studies, 6057Nipissing University, North Bay, ON, Canada.
Adetola GrilloFaculty of Education and Professional Studies, 6057Nipissing University, North Bay, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1045-0606
Roberta McKee-JacksonUCL Institute of Neurology, Dementia Research Centre, 58673University College London, London, UK.
Paul M CamicUCL Institute of Neurology, Dementia Research Centre, 58673University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4444-6544
Gill WindleAgeing and Dementia @ Bangor, Dementia Services Development Centre (DSDC), School of Health Sciences, 1506Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0479-1172
Joshua StottDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, 58673University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1361-053X
Emily BrotherhoodUCL Institute of Neurology, Dementia Research Centre, 58673University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6244-7735
Sebastian J CrutchUCL Institute of Neurology, Dementia Research Centre, 58673University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4160-0139
Rare Dementia Support (RDS) research teamUCL Institute of Neurology, Dementia Research Centre, 58673University College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this integrative review was to identify and synthesize the literature on peer support interventions for people living with or caring for someone with a rare or young onset dementia.

designA literature search of articles was performed using the Nipissing University Primo search system, a central index that enables simultaneous searches across databases which included MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Sociological Abstracts, Cochrane Library.

resultsThe eleven papers that met the inclusion criteria spanned eighteen years and from five countries. Studies reported on peer support programs that were either hospital-based (n = 6) or community-based (n = 4), and were predominantly led by disciplines in the health sciences. Only one study did not involve delivering services. There was a range of methodological quality within the studies included in the review. Further analysis and synthesis led to the identification of three overarching peer support themes. These included: (1) peers as necessarily part of social support interventions; (2) a theoretical portmanteau; and (3) dementia spaces and relationality.

conclusionConsistent with a much larger body of work examining peer involvement in social interventions, this review reinforced the valuable contribution of peers. A full understanding of the mechanisms of change was not achieved. Notwithstanding, the issue of studies neglecting to sufficiently conceptualize and describe interventions is an important one - drawing attention to the need to continue to explore varied delivery, including co-produced models, and more effective evaluation strategies to inform the dementia care sector.

Indexed as

DementiaHospitalsHumansPeer Groupintegrative reviewpeer supportrare dementiarelationalityyoung onset dementia

Identifiers

PMID36114712
PMCPMC9583292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.