ArticleAnnals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc2022
The clinical effect of WeChat-based MUST education model on patients with chronic heart failure.
Article in Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving therapeutic outcomes in heart failure with reduced nonvalvular ejection fraction: A clinical study of heart failure education intervention.Clinical cardiology · 2024Trial
- The Effectiveness and Current Challenges of Home-Based Cardiac Telerehabilitation for Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Narrative Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- The clinical effect of WeChat-based MUST education model on patients with chronic heart failure.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the effect of WeChat-based MUST nursing intervention on self-care ability and quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure.
methodConvenient sampling was used to select CHF patients who received treatment in XX Hospital from January 1, 2020, to December 30, 2020, as the study subjects and was divided into the experimental group (n = 60) and the control group (n = 60) according to the random number table. The experimental group used the WeChat-based MUST nursing intervention, and the control group used the routine education and follow-up model. Cardiac function parameters, self-care ability, and other indicators were compared between the two groups before and after nursing. The clinical effect of two groups was evaluated.
resultsAfter the nursing intervention, LVEF levels were increased to different extents and NT-proBNP was decreased to different extents in both groups. LVEF level in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group, and the NT-proBNP level in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group. After the nursing intervention, the self-care ability and quality of life of the two groups were increased to varying degrees. Self-care ability was higher in the experimental group than in the control group, and quality of life was higher in the experimental group than in the control group.
conclusionThe WeChat-based MUST nursing intervention model in patients with chronic heart failure, compared with the conventional cardiology nursing model, can effectively improve the self-care ability of patients, improve the knowledge level and quality of life of patients with heart failure, and reduce the readmission rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.