Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36114696›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2022

A machine-learning approach for predicting impaired consciousness in absence epilepsy.

Max Springer, Aya Khalaf, Peter Vincent, Jun Hwan Ryu, Yasmina Abukhadra, Sandor Beniczky, Tracy Glauser, Heinz Krestel, Hal Blumenfeld

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Max Springer *Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Aya Khalaf *Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Peter VincentDepartment of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Jun Hwan RyuDepartment of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Yasmina AbukhadraDepartment of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Sandor BeniczkyDepartment of Clinical Neuorophysiology, Danish Epilepsy Center, Dianalund, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6035-6581
Tracy GlauserDivision of Neurology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Heinz KrestelDepartment of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Hal BlumenfeldDepartment of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0812-8132
Yale University · USAarhus University Hospital · DKCairo University · EGCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USGoethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Impact of Initial Therapy and Response on Long Term Outcome in Children with CAEU01NS045911 · NINDS · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI GLAUSER, TRACY A · 2003 to 2013
$31.1M
Functional Neuroimaging in Childhood Absence EpilepsyR01NS055829 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI BLUMENFELD, HAL · 2006 to 2016
$3.2M
Neuroimaging, neuronal firing and behavior in spike-wave seizuresR37NS100901 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI BLUMENFELD, HAL · 2017 to 2023
$3.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIH HHS R01 NS055829NIH HHS R37NS100901NIH HHS U01 NS045911NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS055829NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS100901NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS045911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavior during 3-4 Hz spike-wave discharges (SWDs) in absence epilepsy can vary from obvious behavioral arrest to no detectible deficits. Knowing if behavior is impaired is crucial for clinical care but may be difficult to determine without specialized behavioral testing, often inaccessible in practice. We aimed to develop a pure electroencephalography (EEG)-based machine-learning method to predict SWD-related behavioral impairment. Our classification goals were 100% predictive value, with no behaviorally impaired SWDs misclassified as spared; and maximal sensitivity. First, using labeled data with known behavior (130 SWDs in 34 patients), we extracted EEG time, frequency domain, and common spatial pattern features and applied support vector machines and linear discriminant analysis to classify SWDs as spared or impaired. We evaluated 32 classification models, optimized with 10-fold cross-validation. We then generalized these models to unlabeled data (220 SWDs in 41 patients), where behavior during individual SWDs was not known, but observers reported the presence of clinical seizures. For labeled data, the best classifier achieved 100% spared predictive value and 93% sensitivity. The best classifier on the unlabeled data achieved 100% spared predictive value, but with a lower sensitivity of 35%, corresponding to a conservative classification of 8 patients out of 23 as free of clinical seizures. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of machine learning to predict impaired behavior during SWDs based on EEG features. With additional validation and optimization in a larger data sample, applications may include EEG-based prediction of driving safety, treatment adjustment, and insight into mechanisms of impaired consciousness in absence seizures.

Indexed as

Epilepsy, AbsenceConsciousnessElectroencephalographyHumansMachine LearningSeizures

Identifiers

PMID36114696
PMCPMC9539371
OpenAlexW4296163877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.