ArticleNursing open2023
The effect of design thinking approach in interprofessional education programme of human sexuality course: A quasi-experimental design.
Article in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychometric Properties of the Traditional Chinese Version of the Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey.Research in nursing & health · 2026Article
- Co-Creation Methodology for Developing a Racial Inclusivity Training Resource in Physiotherapy Education.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Utilizing Design Thinking for Effective Multidisciplinary Diabetes Management.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The effect of design thinking approach in interprofessional education programme of human sexuality course: A quasi-experimental design.Nursing open · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo determine the effect of design thinking approach in interprofessional education programme of human sexuality course.
designA pre-test and post-test of single-group quasi-experimental study.
methodsThe 35 nursing students and seven psychology students in their third year were selected by the computer randomly sampling through the lottery method. The course proceeded between September 2019 and January 2020. The participants had received an 8-week, 16-hr design thinking approach in interprofessional education programme of human sexuality course (one section per week, 2 hr per section). We used the nursing attitude toward sexual healthcare scale, nursing intervention toward sexual healthcare scale to assess students' attitude and behaviour intention toward sexual health care and competence of interprofessional education scale to assess students' competence of cooperation before and after the teaching programme. Data analysis used descriptive statistics and t-tests. A qualitative reflection log was also provided and analysed for themes. The SQUIRE-EDU checklist was followed.
resultsThe students' attitude and behavioural intention dimension score in the post-test is higher than those in the pre-test and reach statistically significant differences both in total and subscale. Interprofessional core competence score of Observation Experience, Reflective Feedback, Interprofessional Cooperation, Innovative Design, and Applied Technology score in the post-test is higher than those in the pre-test and reach statistically significant differences both in total and subscale. Design thinking in interprofessional education programme of human sexuality course could significantly improve both nursing and psychology students' attitude, behaviour intention of providing sexual health care and competence of interprofessional cooperation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.