Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36114664›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2022

Short-term plasticity of neuro-auditory processing induced by musical active listening training.

Peter Schneider, Christine Groß, Valdis Bernhofs, Markus Christiner, Jan Benner, Sabrina Turker, Bettina M Zeidler, Annemarie Seither-Preisler

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Peter SchneiderDivision of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christine GroßDivision of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Heidelberg, Germany.
Valdis BernhofsJazeps Vitols Latvian Academy of Music, Riga, Latvia.
Markus ChristinerJazeps Vitols Latvian Academy of Music, Riga, Latvia.
Jan BennerDivision of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sabrina TurkerLise Meitner Research Group "Cognition and Plasticity", Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Bettina M ZeidlerCentre for Systematic Musicology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Annemarie Seither-PreislerCentre for Systematic Musicology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-3084-1911
University of Graz · ATHeidelberg University · DEJāzeps Vītols Latvian Academy of Music · LVMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although there is strong evidence for the positive effects of musical training on auditory perception, processing, and training-induced neuroplasticity, there is still little knowledge on the auditory and neurophysiological short-term plasticity through listening training. In a sample of 37 adolescents (20 musicians and 17 nonmusicians) that was compared to a control group matched for age, gender, and musical experience, we conducted a 2-week active listening training (AULOS: Active IndividUalized Listening OptimizationS). Using magnetoencephalography and psychoacoustic tests, the short-term plasticity of auditory evoked fields and auditory skills were examined in a pre-post design, adapted to the individual neuro-auditory profiles. We found bilateral, but more pronounced plastic changes in the right auditory cortex. Moreover, we observed synchronization of the auditory evoked P1, N1, and P2 responses and threefold larger amplitudes of the late P2 response, similar to the reported effects of musical long-term training. Auditory skills and thresholds benefited largely from the AULOS training. Remarkably, after training, the mean thresholds improved by 12 dB for bone conduction and by 3-4 dB for air conduction. Thus, our findings indicate a strong positive influence of active listening training on neural auditory processing and perception in adolescence, when the auditory system is still developing.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexMusicAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAuditory PerceptionEvoked Potentials, AuditoryHumansInfant, NewbornMagnetoencephalographyNeuronal Plasticityactive listening trainingauditory evoked fieldsAULOSmagnetoencephalographymusical practiceshort-term plasticitysynchronizationTomatis

Identifiers

PMID36114664
PMCPMC9826140
OpenAlexW4296163631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.