Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36114643›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Language-Independent Hearing Screening - Increasing the Feasibility of a Hearing Screening Self-Test at School-Entry.

Elien Van den Borre, Sam Denys, Lea Zupan, Jan A P M de Laat, Nina Božanić Urbančič, Astrid van Wieringen, Jan Wouters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elien Van den BorreDepartment of Neurosciences, Research Group ExpORL, 26657KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6352-0500
Sam DenysDepartment of Neurosciences, Research Group ExpORL, 26657KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8692-4452
Lea ZupanDepartment of ear, nose, and throat, 59057General Hospital Celje, Celje, Slovenia.
Jan A P M de LaatDepartment of Audiology (ear, nose, and throat), 4501Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
Nina Božanić UrbančičDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Cervicofacial Surgery, 37664University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Astrid van WieringenDepartment of Neurosciences, Research Group ExpORL, 26657KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jan WoutersDepartment of Neurosciences, Research Group ExpORL, 26657KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A tablet-based language-independent self-test involving the recognition of ecological sounds in background noise, the Sound Ear Check (SEC), was adapted to make it feasible for young children. Two experiments were conducted. The first experiment investigated the SEC's feasibility, as well as its sensitivity and specificity for detecting childhood hearing loss with a monaural adaptive test procedure. In the second experiment, the SEC sounds, noise, and test format were adapted based on the findings of the first experiment. The adaptations were combined with three test procedures, one similar to the one used in Experiment 1, one presenting the sounds dichotically in diotic noise, and one presenting all the sounds with a fixed signal-to-noise ratio and a stopping rule. Results in young children show high sensitivity and specificity to detect different grades of conductive and sensorineural hearing loss (70-90%). When using an adaptive, monaural procedure, the test duration was approximately 6 min, and 17% of the results obtained were unreliable. Adaptive staircase analyses showed that the unreliable results probably occur due to attention/motivation loss. The test duration could be reduced to 3-4 min with adapted test formats without decreasing the test-retest reliability. The unreliable test results could be reduced from 17% to as low as 5%. However, dichotic presentation requires longer training, reducing the dichotic test format's feasibility.

Indexed as

LanguageSelf-TestingChildChild, PreschoolFeasibility StudiesHearingHumansReproducibility of ResultsSchoolschildhood hearing lossconductive hearing losshearing screeningsensorineural hearing losssuprathreshold

Identifiers

PMID36114643
PMCPMC9486290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.