Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36114488›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Cross-sectorial collaboration on policy-driven rehabilitation care models for persons with neuromuscular diseases: reflections and behavior of community-based health professionals.

Charlotte Handberg, Ulla Werlauff

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Charlotte HandbergNational Rehabilitation Center for Neuromuscular Diseases, Kongsvang Allé 23, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark. chha@rcfm.dk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1378-2449
Ulla WerlauffNational Rehabilitation Center for Neuromuscular Diseases, Kongsvang Allé 23, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5294-2046
Aarhus University · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersons with neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) often experience complex rehabilitation needs due to the disease's impact on their functioning and progression of their diseases. As a consequence of legislation and "policy power", community-based health professionals function as gatekeepers to the rehabilitation trajectory for persons with NMDs in a field where the other professionals are the specialists.

aimTo investigate community-based health professionals' reflections on and behaviors regarding collaboration with a tertiary rehabilitation hospital in a cross-sectorial rehabilitation care model with the overall aim of providing high quality rehabilitation for persons with NMD.

methodsThe design is qualitative and uses interpretive description methodology and the theoretical lens of Edgar Schein's three levels of organizational culture and leadership. An ethnographic fieldwork was conducted from September 1, 2019 to January 30, 2020. Eighty-four community-based health professionals were included and 17 of them were interviewed in four semi-structured focus group interviews (n = 10) and seven individual interviews (n = 7). In addition, 151 pages of observation data were generated. The study adheres to the COREQ guidelines.

resultsThe analysis showed three themes of importance for the collaboration: Policy and legislation navigation represented that collaboration on rehabilitation was affected by legislation as a management tool with "the case" as the core element, and goal dilemmas. Cross-sectorial knowledge exchange promoted collaboration on coordinated and facilitated rehabilitation and knowledge sharing as a firm anchoring. Patient ownership negotiations implied collaboration was influenced by knowledge founded power and gatekeeping as a navigation tool.

conclusionThree levels of organizational culture and leadership were identified, and this overall structure guided the community-based health professionals in their work and in the complex organizational landscape of collaboration between disconnected healthcare systems. The findings provided insight into behavior and attitudes and the content and the values held by the professionals collaborating across sectors. Future collaboration in rehabilitation models should be multiprofessional and team based. The findings emphasize that it is imperative that managements and professionals strive to strengthen the structure of the collaborative team spirit because this will ensure well-planned, coordinated, and conducted rehabilitation for persons with NMD and enable and support future cross-sectorial collaboration in this rehabilitation model for these persons.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelNeuromuscular DiseasesCooperative BehaviorHumansPolicyPublic HealthCollaborationCommunity careCoordination¸ policy decisionsCultureFundamental careHealthcare professionalsNeuromuscular diseasesOrganizationRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID36114488
PMCPMC9482251
OpenAlexW4296161020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.