Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36114484›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

The role of informational support from women's social networks on antenatal care initiation: qualitative evidence from pregnant women in Uganda.

Alison B Comfort, Alison M El Ayadi, Carol S Camlin, Alexander C Tsai, Hadija Nalubwama, Josaphat Byamugisha, Dilys M Walker, James Moody, Tatyana Roberts, Umar Senoga and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Maternal Mortality in Africa: Regional Trends (2000-2017).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Alison B ComfortBixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA. Alison.comfort@ucsf.edu.
Alison M El AyadiBixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Carol S CamlinBixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, 1330 Broadway, Suite 1100, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA.
Alexander C TsaiCenter for Global Health and Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 125 Nashua Street, Suite 722, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Hadija NalubwamaCollege of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Makerere University, PO Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Josaphat ByamugishaCollege of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Makerere University, PO Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Dilys M WalkerBixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
James MoodyDuke University, 268 Soc/Psych Building, Durham, NC, 27708-0088, USA.
Tatyana RobertsBixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Umar SenogaCollege of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Makerere University, PO Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Paul J KrezanoskiUniversity of California San Francisco, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, 1001 Potrero Ave, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA.
Cynthia C HarperBixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USMakerere University · UGIbis Reproductive Health · USDuke University · USHarvard University · USSan Francisco General Hospital · US

Funding

Focused Training in Social Networks and HealthR25HD079352 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MOODY, JAMES · 2015 to 2024
$1.6M
Identifying gaps between LLIN use and vector exposure to improve malaria controlK23AI139364 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KREZANOSKI, PAUL JOSEPH · 2019 to 2023
$986k
Mentoring Clinical Investigators in Patient Oriented Research on Human Mobility and HIVK24MH126808 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CAMLIN, CAROL SUZANNE · 2021 to 2025
$827k
Understanding individual- and social network-level factors affecting infant HIV testing to design social network interventions to increase testing of HIV-exposed infantsK01HD105521 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI COMFORT, ALISON B · 2021 to 2025
$722k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI139364NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD105521NICHD NIH HHS R25 HD079352NIMH NIH HHS K24 MH126808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly and appropriate use of antenatal care services is critical for reducing maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity. Yet most women in sub-Saharan Africa, including Uganda, do not seek antenatal care until later during pregnancy. This qualitative study explored pregnant women's reliance on social ties for information about initiation of antenatal care.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured, in-depth interviews with 30 pregnant women seeking their first antenatal care visit at Kawempe Referral Hospital in Kampala, Uganda. Recruitment was done purposively to obtain variation by parity and whether women currently had a male partner. Study recruitment occurred from August 25

resultsWe found that the most important source of information about antenatal care initiation was these women's mothers. Other sources included their mothers-in-law, female elders including grandmothers, and male partners. Sisters and female friends were less influential information sources about antenatal initiation. One of the primary reasons for relying on their own mothers, mothers-in-law, and elder women was due to these women's lived experience with pregnancy and childbirth. Trust in the relationship was also an important factor. Some pregnant women were less likely to rely on their sisters or female friends, either due to lack of trust or these women's lack of experience with pregnancy and childbirth. The advice that pregnant women received from their mothers and others on the ideal timing for antenatal care initiation varied significantly, including examples of misinformation about when to initiate antenatal care. Pregnant women seemed less likely to delay care when more than one social tie encouraged early antenatal care.

conclusionsEducating women's social networks, especially their mothers, mothers-in-law, and community elders, about the importance of early antenatal care initiation is a promising avenue for encouraging pregnant women to seek care earlier in pregnancy.

Indexed as

Pregnant PeoplePrenatal CareAgedFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleParityPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancySocial NetworkingUgandaAntenatal careInformational supportPregnancySocial networksSocial supportUganda

Identifiers

PMID36114484
PMCPMC9479405
OpenAlexW4296046787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.