Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36114459›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2022

Pharmacist-led medication reviews in primary healthcare for adult community-dwelling patients - a descriptive study charting a new target group.

Katarina Wickman, Annika Dobszai, Sara Modig, Beata Borgström Bolmsjö, Gabriella Caleres, Cecilia Lenander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katarina WickmanDepartment of clinical sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden. Katarina.Wickman@med.lu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-4492-1894
Annika DobszaiDepartment of clinical sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2689-7429
Sara ModigDepartment of clinical sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7775-4482
Beata Borgström BolmsjöDepartment of clinical sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7655-0613
Gabriella CaleresDepartment of clinical sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5296-3656
Cecilia LenanderDepartment of clinical sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0553-7432

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication treatment can reduce morbidity but can also cause drug-related problems (DRPs). One method to identify and solve DRPs is medication reviews (MRs) that are aimed at increased patient safety and quality in drug treatment. In Skåne county, Sweden, a well-established multi-professional model for MRs in nursing homes is practiced. However, a demand for MRs regarding community-dwelling patients has emerged. These patients may be extra vulnerable since they have less supervision from healthcare personnel.

aimTo describe the community-dwelling patients in primary healthcare considered in need of an MR, as well as the outcomes of these pharmacist-led MRs.

methodsPersonnel from 14 primary healthcare centers selected patients for the MRs. Based on electronic medical records, the symptom assessment tool PHASE-20 (PHArmacotherapeutical Symptom Evaluation 20 questions) and medication lists, pharmacists conducted MRs and communicated adjustment suggestions via the medical record to the general practitioners (GPs).

resultsA total of 109 patients were included in the study and 90.8% (n = 99) of the patients were exposed to at least one DRP, with an average of 3.9 DRPs per patient. Patients with impaired renal function (glomerular filtration rate, GFR < 45 ml/min) or ≥ 10 medications were exposed to a significantly higher number of DRPs per patient, 5.1 DRP and 5.3 respectively. The most frequent DRP-categories were Unnecessary drug therapy and Adverse drug reaction, which represented 23.0% respectively 22.9% of the total amount of DRPs.

conclusionsOur results indicate a prioritized need for MRs for community-dwelling patients, specifically with impaired renal function or polypharmacy.

Indexed as

General PractitionersPharmacistsAdultHumansIndependent LivingMedication ReviewPrimary Health CareDrug-related problemIndependent livingMedication reviewPharmacist, clinicalPrimary healthcare

Identifiers

PMID36114459
PMCPMC9482154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.