ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022
Filtering ASVs/OTUs via mutual information-based microbiome network analysis.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unveiling Dietary Complexity: A Scoping Review and Reporting Guidance for Network Analysis in Dietary Pattern Research.Nutrients · 2025Article
- The Ground Beetle Poecilus (Carabidae) Gut Microbiome and Its Functionality.Microbial ecology · 2025Article
- Bacterial and Fungal Communities Respond Differently to Changing Soil Properties Along Afforestation Dynamic.Microbial ecology · 2025Article
- Chinese expert consensus on standard technical specifications for a gut microecomics laboratory (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2024Review
- YACHT: an ANI-based statistical test to detect microbial presence/absence in a metagenomic sample.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- MicroNet-MIMRF: a microbial network inference approach based on mutual information and Markov random fields.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- YACHT: an ANI-based statistical test to detect microbial presence/absence in a metagenomic sample.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Connect the dots: sketching out microbiome interactions through networking approaches.Microbiome research reports · 2023Review
- Article
- Fecal microbiome profiles of neonatal dairy calves with varying severities of gastrointestinal disease.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microbial communities are widely studied using high-throughput sequencing techniques, such as 16S rRNA gene sequencing. These techniques have attracted biologists as they offer powerful tools to explore microbial communities and investigate their patterns of diversity in biological and biomedical samples at remarkable resolution. However, the accuracy of these methods can negatively affected by the presence of contamination. Several studies have recognized that contamination is a common problem in microbial studies and have offered promising computational and laboratory-based approaches to assess and remove contaminants. Here we propose a novel strategy, MI-based (mutual information based) filtering method, which uses information theoretic functionals and graph theory to identify and remove contaminants. We applied MI-based filtering method to a mock community data set and evaluated the amount of information loss due to filtering taxa. We also compared our method to commonly practice traditional filtering methods. In a mock community data set, MI-based filtering approach maintained the true bacteria in the community without significant loss of information. Our results indicate that MI-based filtering method effectively identifies and removes contaminants in microbial communities and hence it can be beneficial as a filtering method to microbiome studies. We believe our filtering method has two advantages over traditional filtering methods. First, it does not required an arbitrary choice of threshold and second, it is able to detect true taxa with low abundance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.