Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36114407›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Walking paths during collaborative carriages do not follow the simple rules observed in the locomotion of single walking subjects.

Isabelle Maroger, Manon Silva, Hélène Pillet, Nicolas Turpin, Olivier Stasse, Bruno Watier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Isabelle MarogerLAAS-CNRS, UPS, CNRS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France. imaroger@laas.fr.
Manon SilvaLAAS-CNRS, UPS, CNRS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Hélène PilletInstitut de Biomécanique Humaine Georges Charpak, Arts et Métiers Sciences et Technologie, Paris, France.
Nicolas TurpinLaboratoire IRISSE, EA4075, UFR des Sciences de l'Homme et de l'Environnement, Université de la Réunion, Le Tampon, France.
Olivier StasseLAAS-CNRS, UPS, CNRS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Bruno WatierLAAS-CNRS, UPS, CNRS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some works have already studied human trajectories during spontaneous locomotion. However, this topic has not been thoroughly studied in the context of human-human interactions, especially during collaborative carriage tasks. Thus, this manuscript aims to provide a broad analysis of the kinematics of two subjects carrying a table. In the present study, 20 pairs of subjects moved a table to 9 different goal positions distant of 2.7-5.4 m. This was performed with only one or both subjects knowing the target location. The analysis of the collected data demonstrated that there is no shared strategy implemented by all the pairs to move the table around. We observed a great variability in the pairs' behaviours. Even the same pair can implement various strategies to move a table to the same goal position. Moreover, a model of the trajectories adopted by collaborating pairs was proposed and optimized with an inverse optimal control scheme. Even if it produced consistent results, due to the great variability which origins were not elucidated, it was not possible to accurately simulate the average trajectories nor the individual ones. Thus, the approach that was shown to be efficient to simulate single walking subjects failed to model the behaviour of collaborating pairs.

Indexed as

LocomotionWalkingBiomechanical PhenomenaHumans

Identifiers

PMID36114407
PMCPMC9481648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.