ReviewAesthetic plastic surgery2023
Timing of Surgery and Treatment Options for Congenital Ptosis in Children: A Narrative Review of the Literature.
Review in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical Timing Before Age 3 for Congenital Ptosis: Enhancing Refractive Parameters Recovery in Children.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Refinement of maximal levator resection for blepharoptosis correction: High incision and advancement of levator complex.JPRAS open · 2026Article
- From blink to care: smartphone video-based functional analysis and personalized management in pediatric blepharoptosis.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of Conjoint Fascial Sheath Suspension and Levator Muscle-conjoint Fascial Sheath Complex Suspension in Blepharoptosis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Congenital ptosis has varying degrees of impact on the visual development or psychological health of a child depending on its severity. Some controversies and misconceptions remain regarding the management of congenital ptosis in children. Particularly, the accurate diagnosis of the severity of congenital ptosis in younger children, assessment of the visual developmental status of the child, optimal timing of surgery, and treatment choice are still issues in clinical practice that need to be explored. This report presents a comprehensive review of these aspects of the correction of congenital ptosis to provide a valuable reference for clinical practice. Our review shows that currently used surgical procedures for ptosis may result in over- or under-correction to varying degrees. The differences may be due to the physical condition and age of the child and the degree of cooperation during preoperative examination and assessment, resulting in inaccurate results. Alternatively, intraoperative swelling and bleeding may lead to errors in the values recorded by the surgeon. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.