ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2022
Radiotherapy or systemic therapy versus combined therapy in patients with brain metastases: a propensity-score matched study.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Repeat stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent brain metastases: a retrospective comparison of local progression and distant brain metastases after prior radiosurgery.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Dosimetric and Clinical Prognostic Factors in Single-Isocenter Linac-Based Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases.Cancers · 2024Article
- The therapeutic effect of radiotherapy combined with systemic therapy compared to radiotherapy alone in patients with simple brain metastasis after first-line treatment of limited-stage small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Review
- Retrospective non-inferiority study of stereotactic radiosurgery for more than ten brain metastases.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimThis study aimed to evaluate the clinical benefits of systemic therapy (ST) combined with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BM).
methodsThe patient data were extracted from the institutional disease database from 2016 to 2021. Surgical and whole-brain radiotherapy cases and poor Karnofsky performance status (KPS < 70) were excluded. The eligible patients were divided into monotherapy (SRS alone or ST alone) and combined therapy (SRS and ST, combined within a month). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to examine factors associated with increased risk of death and intracranial progression. The propensity score for selecting treatment was calculated based on existing prognostic covariates. Two groups were matched 1:1 and compared for intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
resultsWe identified 1605 patients and analyzed 928 (monotherapy: n = 494, combined therapy: n = 434). In a multivariable model, the combined therapy was independently associated with improved PFS and OS relative to the monotherapy. At the median follow-up of 383 days in the matched dataset, the combined therapy group showed significantly longer PFS (median, 7.4 vs. 5.0 months, P < 0.001) and OS (median, 23.1 vs. 17.2 months, P = 0.036) than the monotherapy group. The overall intracranial progression and mortality risk was reduced in the combined therapy group, with an estimated HR of 0.70 and 0.78.
conclusionsCombined therapy exhibited longer PFS and OS than monotherapy in BM patients. The results support the recent trend toward combining systemic and local therapies, encouraging future clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.