Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36114349›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2022

Validity of age estimation methods and reproducibility of bone/dental maturity indices for chronological age estimation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of validation studies.

V Marconi, M Iommi, C Monachesi, A Faragalli, E Skrami, R Gesuita, L Ferrante, F Carle

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Bone age and dental age to assess criminal responsibility: Part II.International journal of legal medicine · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Artificial intelligence in forensic medicine and forensic dentistry.The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

V Marconi *Postgraduate School of Medical Statistics and Biometry, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60126, Ancona, Italy.
M Iommi *Center of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Medical Information Technology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60126, Ancona, Italy.
C MonachesiDepartment of Pediatrics, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60123, Ancona, Italy.
A FaragalliCenter of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Medical Information Technology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60126, Ancona, Italy.
E SkramiCenter of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Medical Information Technology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60126, Ancona, Italy. e.skrami@staff.univpm.it.
R GesuitaCenter of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Medical Information Technology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60126, Ancona, Italy.
L FerranteCenter of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Medical Information Technology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60126, Ancona, Italy.
F CarleCenter of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Medical Information Technology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60126, Ancona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several approaches have been developed to estimate age, an important aspect of forensics and orthodontics, using different measures and radiological examinations. Here, through meta-analysis, we determined the validity of age estimation methods and reproducibility of bone/dental maturity indices used for age estimation. The PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched to December 31, 2021 for human cross-sectional studies meeting pre-defined PICOS criteria that simultaneously assessed the reproducibility and validity. Meta-estimates of validity (mean error: estimated age-chronological age) and intra- and inter-observer reproducibility (Cohen's kappa, intraclass correlation coefficient) and their predictive intervals (PI) were calculated using mixed-effect models when heterogeneity was high (I

Indexed as

PublicationsCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMalePubMedReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID36114349
PMCPMC9481543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.