SynthesisBrain imaging and behavior2022
Demographic reporting across a decade of neuroimaging: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Brain imaging and behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- A neurodevelopmental model of eating disorder risk in midlife to older adulthood.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2026Review
- Addressing ethical challenges in the reporting of race and ethnicity population descriptors in human neuroscience research.Frontiers in neuroimaging · 2026Article
- Fostering inclusive participation in non-invasive neurotechnology research: a community-based study with an underrepresented population.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Enhancing MRI accessibility through community engagement for autistic young adults.Discover psychology · 2026Article
- Social Determinants of Health, the developing brain, and risk and resilience for psychopathology.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Review
- What Do Thirty Years of Neuroimaging Research Tell Us About Recreational Cannabis Use and Brain Integrity? A Narrative Review of the Multimodal Neuroimaging Evidence to Date.Substance abuse and rehabilitation · 2026Review
- Endophenotype Research in Epilepsy Across Time.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Social Determinants of Health and Early Brain Development.Pediatric clinics of North America · 2025Review
- Psychiatric neuroimaging at a crossroads: Insights from psychiatric genetics.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2024Review
- Racial and ethnic socioenvironmental inequity and neuroimaging in psychiatry: a brief review of the past and recommendations for the future.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024Review
- Transparency and reproducibility in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2024Article
- Why and how to collect representative study samples in educational neuroscience research.Trends in neuroscience and education · 2024Review
- Transparency and Reproducibility in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Recommendations for the responsible use and communication of race and ethnicity in neuroimaging research.Nature neuroscience · 2024Review
- Looking Upstream to Understand Race/Ethnicity as a Moderator for Poststroke Neuroinflammation and a Social Determinant for Poststroke Aphasia Outcomes.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2024Article
- The coming decade of digital brain research: A vision for neuroscience at the intersection of technology and computing.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Creating diverse and inclusive scientific practices for research datasets and dissemination.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diversity of participants in biomedical research with respect to race, ethnicity, and biological sex is crucial, particularly given differences in disease prevalence, recovery, and survival rates between demographic groups. The objective of this systematic review was to report on the demographics of neuroimaging studies using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The Web of Science database was used and data collection was performed between June 2021 to November 2021; all articles were reviewed independently by at least two researchers. Articles utilizing MR data acquired in the United States, with n ≥ 10 human subjects, and published between 2010-2020 were included. Non-primary research articles and those published in journals that did not meet a quality control check were excluded. Of the 408 studies meeting inclusion criteria, approximately 77% report sex, 10% report race, and 4% report ethnicity. Demographic reporting also varied as function of disease studied, participant age range, funding, and publisher. We anticipate quantitative data on the extent, or lack, of reporting will be necessary to ensure inclusion of diverse populations in biomedical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.