ArticleScientific reports2022
Metal artifact reduction in ultra-high-resolution cone-beam CT imaging with a twin robotic X-ray system.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigating the effectiveness of MAR algorithm on magnitude of artifacts in CBCT images: a systematic review.Oral radiology · 2025Pooled it
- Image quality and radiation dose of cone-beam CT versus multidetector CT for upper extremity osteosynthesis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Efficacy of High-Resolution Cone-Beam CT for the Endovascular Treatment of Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas.Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement · 2025Article
- Sivan classification system for diagnosis of jaw lesions based on visual volumetric analysis of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographic images.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Accuracy of the Hounsfield Unit Values Measured by Implant Planning Software.Dentistry journal · 2024Article
- Universal non-circular cone beam CT orbits for metal artifact reduction imaging during image-guided procedures.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Photon-Counting Detector CT Virtual Monoenergetic Images in Cervical Trauma Imaging-Optimization of Dental Metal Artifacts and Image Quality.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Osseodensification vs. Conventional Osteotomy: A Case Series with Cone Beam Computed Tomography.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been shown to be a powerful tool for 3D imaging of the appendicular skeleton, allowing for detailed visualization of bone microarchitecture. This study was designed to compare artifacts in the presence of osteosynthetic implants between CBCT and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in cadaveric wrist scans. A total of 32 scan protocols with varying tube potential and current were employed: both conventional CBCT and MDCT studies were included with tube voltage ranging from 60 to 140 kVp as well as additional MDCT protocols with dedicated spectral shaping via tin prefiltration. Irrespective of scanner type, all examinations were conducted in ultra-high-resolution (UHR) scan mode. For reconstruction of UHR-CBCT scans an additional iterative metal artifact reduction algorithm was employed, an image correction tool which cannot be used in combination with UHR-MDCT. To compare applied radiation doses between both scanners, the volume computed tomography dose index for a 16 cm phantom (CTDI
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.