Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36114235›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Modelling response time in a mental rotation task by gender, physical activity, and task features.

Patrick Fargier, Stéphane Champely, Raphael Massarelli, Laureine Ammary, Nady Hoyek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Patrick FargierUniversity of Teacher Education, State of Vaud (HEPVD), UER EPS, 1014, Lausanne, Switzerland. patrick.fargier@hepl.ch.
Stéphane Champely *Laboratory of Vulnerabilities and Innovation in Sport (L-Vis), Univ Lyon, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69622, Villeurbanne, France.
Raphael Massarelli *Univ Lyon, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69622, Villeurbanne, France.
Laureine AmmaryInter-University Laboratory on Human Movement Biology (LIBM), Univ Lyon, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69622, Villeurbanne, France.
Nady HoyekInter-University Laboratory on Human Movement Biology (LIBM), Univ Lyon, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69622, Villeurbanne, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental rotation (MR) is a spatial skill considered to be a key-component of intellectual ability. Studies have suggested that the response time (RT) in a MR task (MRt) might be influenced, with possible gender differences, by the practice of a physical activity (PA) and depending on the plane, direction, degrees of the MR and the frame of reference to perform it. The present study aimed at examining the respective influences of all these variables on the RT by developing a linear mixed-effect model from the RTs varying according to the MR plane, direction, degrees and frame of reference. The MRt was performed by 96 males and females, all undergraduate students, distributed in three groups (sedentary subjects, artistic gymnasts, and futsal players). The results showed that only gender had a main effect (faster log RT in males), probably task-dependent. The other variables interacted among them showing that: (a) the log RT may be influenced by rotations experienced during PA, in particular during the locomotion on a horizontal ground and (b) such influence mainly depends on the compatibility of the physical rotations experienced with the plane and the degrees of the MRt.

Indexed as

SportsCognitionExerciseFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID36114235
PMCPMC9481519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.