Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36114227›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Bryozoan-cnidarian mutualism triggered a new strategy for greater resource exploitation as early as the Late Silurian.

Mikołaj K Zapalski, Olev Vinn, Ursula Toom, Andrej Ernst, Mark A Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mikołaj K ZapalskiUniversity of Warsaw, Faculty of Geology, Żwirki i Wigury 93, 02-089, Warszawa, Poland. m.zapalski@uw.edu.pl.
Olev VinnInstitute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Ravila 14A, 50411, Tartu, Estonia.
Ursula ToomDepartment of Geology, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate Tee 5, 19086, Tallinn, Estonia.
Andrej ErnstInstitut für Geologie, Universität Hamburg, Bundesstr. 55, 20146, Hamburg, Germany.
Mark A WilsonDepartment of Earth Sciences, The College of Wooster, Wooster, OH, 44691, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bryozoans were common benthic invertebrates in the Silurian seas. The large biodiversity among Silurian benthic organisms prompted diversified interactions, and as a result bryozoans hosted many other organisms as symbionts. Here we analyse the cystoporate bryozoan Fistulipora przhidolensis and unidentified trepostomes intergrown with auloporid tabulate corals and putative hydrozoans. The material comes from the uppermost Přídolí Series (Late Silurian) of the Sõrve Peninsula, Saaremaa, Estonia. Our analysis shows that the interaction was beneficial for both organisms-cnidarians benefited from feeding currents created by the host bryozoan, while the latter benefited from the protection from predators by cnidae, it can thus be classified as mutualism. Such associations are common in modern seas. The analysed organisms are typically encrusting when the symbiosis is absent, when intergrown they display erect, branching morphologies, raised over the substratum, thus exploiting a higher suspension-feeding tier. While similar associations were known from the Devonian, we demonstrate that this novel ecological strategy for greater resource exploitation started as early as the latest Silurian.

Indexed as

AnthozoaBryozoaAnimalsInvertebratesOceans and SeasSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID36114227
PMCPMC9481587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.