ArticleScientific reports2022
Multiclass classification of breast cancer histopathology images using multilevel features of deep convolutional neural network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanosensitive TRPV4 immunohistochemistry improves deep learning-based classification of ductal carcinoma in situ beyond H&E morphology.The journal of pathology. Clinical research · 2026Article
- Predicting Metastatic Potential from Histopathological Whole Slide Images of Primary Tumors in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using Attention-Based Deep Learning and Signaling Pathway Alterations.Head and neck pathology · 2026Article
- Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease Tissue Classification From Pathology Slide Images: Detecting Phenotypes Using Computer Vision.Gastro hep advances · 2026Article
- Resilient Sinkhorn-Based Optimal Transport Late Fusion Framework for Breast Cancer Diagnosis.Cancer informatics · 2026Article
- Rapid cancer diagnosis using deep learning-powered label-free subcellular-resolution photoacoustic histology.Science advances · 2025Article
- A Multimodal Diagnostic Model for Breast Cancer Invasiveness Based on Ultrasound Imaging and Serum Biomarkers.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Deep learning and radiomics integration of photoacoustic/ultrasound imaging for non-invasive prediction of luminal and non-luminal breast cancer subtypes.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- Generalized deep learning for histopathology image classification using supervised contrastive learning.Journal of advanced research · 2025Article
- Deep learning model for grading carcinoma with Gini-based feature selection and linear production-inspired feature fusion.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Not seeing the trees for the forest. The impact of neighbours on graph-based configurations in histopathology.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Varying pixel resolution significantly improves deep learning-based carotid plaque histology segmentation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep-learning based morphological segmentation of canine diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based method for grading histopathological liver fibrosis in rodent models of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Computational pathology: A survey review and the way forward.Journal of pathology informatics · 2024Review
- Improving generalization capability of deep learning-based nuclei instance segmentation by non-deterministic train time and deterministic test time stain normalization.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- OralEpitheliumDB: A Dataset for Oral Epithelial Dysplasia Image Segmentation and Classification.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- PND-Net: plant nutrition deficiency and disease classification using graph convolutional network.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Uncertainty Estimation for Tumor Prediction with Unlabeled Data.Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Workshops · 2024Article
- Article
- Information maximization-based clustering of histopathology images using deep learning.PLOS digital health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is a common malignancy and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women worldwide. Its early diagnosis can significantly reduce the morbidity and mortality rates in women. To this end, histopathological diagnosis is usually followed as the gold standard approach. However, this process is tedious, labor-intensive, and may be subject to inter-reader variability. Accordingly, an automatic diagnostic system can assist to improve the quality of diagnosis. This paper presents a deep learning approach to automatically classify hematoxylin-eosin-stained breast cancer microscopy images into normal tissue, benign lesion, in situ carcinoma, and invasive carcinoma using our collected dataset. Our proposed model exploited six intermediate layers of the Xception (Extreme Inception) network to retrieve robust and abstract features from input images. First, we optimized the proposed model on the original (unnormalized) dataset using 5-fold cross-validation. Then, we investigated its performance on four normalized datasets resulting from Reinhard, Ruifrok, Macenko, and Vahadane stain normalization. For original images, our proposed framework yielded an accuracy of 98% along with a kappa score of 0.969. Also, it achieved an average AUC-ROC score of 0.998 as well as a mean AUC-PR value of 0.995. Specifically, for in situ carcinoma and invasive carcinoma, it offered sensitivity of 96% and 99%, respectively. For normalized images, the proposed architecture performed better for Makenko normalization compared to the other three techniques. In this case, the proposed model achieved an accuracy of 97.79% together with a kappa score of 0.965. Also, it attained an average AUC-ROC score of 0.997 and a mean AUC-PR value of 0.991. Especially, for in situ carcinoma and invasive carcinoma, it offered sensitivity of 96% and 99%, respectively. These results demonstrate that our proposed model outperformed the baseline AlexNet as well as state-of-the-art VGG16, VGG19, Inception-v3, and Xception models with their default settings. Furthermore, it can be inferred that although stain normalization techniques offered competitive performance, they could not surpass the results of the original dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.