Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36114205›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Imprinting fidelity in mouse iPSCs depends on sex of donor cell and medium formulation.

Maria Arez, Melanie Eckersley-Maslin, Tajda Klobučar, João von Gilsa Lopes, Felix Krueger, Annalisa Mupo, Ana Cláudia Raposo, David Oxley, Samantha Mancino, Anne-Valerie Gendrel and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. TET3 protects theiScience · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Why are imprints unstable in pluripotent stem cells?Biochemical Society transactions · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Stem cell models of Angelman syndrome.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.

Maria AreziBB - Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences and Department of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Melanie Eckersley-MaslinEpigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, CB22 3AT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0168-0373
Tajda KlobučarInstituto de Medicina Molecular, João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
João von Gilsa LopesInstituto de Medicina Molecular, João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1478-9041
Felix KruegerBioinformatics Group, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, CB22 3AT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5513-3324
Annalisa MupoEpigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, CB22 3AT, United Kingdom.
Ana Cláudia RaposoiBB - Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences and Department of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
David OxleyMass Spectrometry Facility, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Samantha MancinoiBB - Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences and Department of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Anne-Valerie GendrelInstituto de Medicina Molecular, João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4510-0024
Bruno Bernardes de JesusInstituto de Medicina Molecular, João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Simão Teixeira da RochaiBB - Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences and Department of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal. simao.rocha@tecnico.ulisboa.pt.ORCID 0000-0002-9683-7942
University of Lisbon · PTBabraham Institute · GBCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/B/000C0421Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T009713/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reprogramming of somatic cells into induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs) is a major leap towards personalised approaches to disease modelling and cell-replacement therapies. However, we still lack the ability to fully control the epigenetic status of iPSCs, which is a major hurdle for their downstream applications. Epigenetic fidelity can be tracked by genomic imprinting, a phenomenon dependent on DNA methylation, which is frequently perturbed in iPSCs by yet unknown reasons. To try to understand the causes underlying these defects, we conducted a thorough imprinting analysis using IMPLICON, a high-throughput method measuring DNA methylation levels, in multiple female and male murine iPSC lines generated under different experimental conditions. Our results show that imprinting defects are remarkably common in iPSCs, but their nature depends on the sex of donor cells and their response to culture conditions. Imprints in female iPSCs resist the initial genome-wide DNA demethylation wave during reprogramming, but ultimately cells accumulate hypomethylation defects irrespective of culture medium formulations. In contrast, imprinting defects on male iPSCs depends on the experimental conditions and arise during reprogramming, being mitigated by the addition of vitamin C (VitC). Our findings are fundamental to further optimise reprogramming strategies and generate iPSCs with a stable epigenome.

Indexed as

Induced Pluripotent Stem CellsAnimalsAscorbic AcidDNA MethylationFemaleGenomeGenomic ImprintingMaleMiceAscorbic Acid

Identifiers

PMID36114205
PMCPMC9481624
OpenAlexW4296160975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.