Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36113631›Full record

ArticleChemico-biological interactions2022

Integrating in silico and in vivo approach for investigating the role of polyherbal oil in prevention and treatment of COVID-19 infection.

Amul S Bahl, Vipin Kumar Verma, Jagriti Bhatia, Dharamvir Singh Arya

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemico-biological interactions, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Current computer-aided drug design · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amul S BahlDepartment of Research, Development and Innovation, God's Own Store LLP, Delhi, India. Electronic address: bahlamuls@gmail.com.
Vipin Kumar VermaDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Jagriti BhatiaDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Dharamvir Singh AryaDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India. Electronic address: dsarya16@gmail.com.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INResearch & Development Establishment (Engrs.) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, there are no FDA approved antiviral drugs available to treat COVID-19 patients. Also, due to emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants, the protective efficacy of vaccines could be reduced, hence it is urgent to have alternative treatments for combating the SARS-CoV-2 infection. Since, there is a long-standing history of herbal medicine in the treatment of respiratory diseases. In the present study, we investigated two polyherbal oil blend viz. Sudarshan AV and Elixir AV (SAV and EAV) in inhibiting SARS-COV-2. From GC-MS analysis of polyherbal oils (SAV and EAV) a total of 11 active compounds were selected, on the basis of their abundance and activity. Further, from the molecular docking studies, we found an inhibitory effect of these compounds on viral envelope and membrane, spike proteins whilst an agonistic effect with human host receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) implicating the crucial role of the individual compound in resistance of SARS-CoV-2. Since, the in-silico results suggest that polyherbal oil (SAV and EAV) contributes in preventing the entry of SARS-CoV-2 into the human body, we further investigated the efficacy of polyherbal formulated essential oil (FEO; SAV & EAV) in prevention and treatment of COVID-19 in hamster model. The male golden Syrian hamsters (n = 23) were divided into 5 groups i.e., Group 1: Control (n = 3); Group 2: Infected (n = 5); Group 3: Infected + Remdesivir (n = 5); Group 4: Infected + FEO (n = 5) and Group 5: Prophylactic FEO + Infected (n = 5). In both treatment and prophylactic groups, the FEO's significantly reduced the lung injury investigated histo-pathologically and viral load expression measured by real time PCR in comparison to infected hamsters. Furthermore, cytokines expression analysis clearly highlighted the efficacy of FEO's due to its anti-inflammatory activity and overall protection in treatment groups. In conclusion, the FEO (SAV & EAV) seem to be potent in both prevention and treatment of COVID-19 and related lung injury.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentLung InjuryOils, VolatileAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2AnimalsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntiviral AgentsCricetinaeCytokinesHumansMaleMolecular Docking SimulationPeptidyl-Dipeptidase ASARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Anti-Inflammatory AgentsAntiviral AgentsCytokinesOils, VolatilePeptidyl-Dipeptidase ASpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2Anti-inflammatoryCOVID-19GC-MSMolecular dockingPolyherbal oilTherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID36113631
PMCPMC9472470
OpenAlexW4295743138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.