Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36113576›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2022

Group vs traditional prenatal care for improving racial equity in preterm birth and low birthweight: the Centering and Racial Disparities randomized clinical trial study.

Amy H Crockett, Liwei Chen, Emily C Heberlein, Jessica L Britt, Sarah Covington-Kolb, Brian Witrick, Emily Doherty, Lu Zhang, Ann Borders, Lauren Keenan-Devlin and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Patient Characteristics Associated With Group Prenatal Care Attendance in a Randomized Controlled Trial.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Amy H CrockettDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prisma Health and the University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, SC. Electronic address: amy.crockett@prismahealth.org.
Liwei ChenDepartment of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Emily C HeberleinGeorgia Health Policy Center, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.
Jessica L BrittDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prisma Health, Greenville, SC.
Sarah Covington-KolbCenter for Community Health Alignment, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
Brian WitrickDepartment of Public Health Sciences, College of Behavioral, Social, and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC.
Emily DohertyDepartment of Public Health Sciences, College of Behavioral, Social, and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC.
Lu ZhangDepartment of Public Health Sciences, College of Behavioral, Social, and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC.
Ann BordersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL.
Lauren Keenan-DevlinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL.
Britney SmartDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL.
Moonseong HeoDepartment of Public Health Sciences, College of Behavioral, Social, and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC.
Clemson University · USNorthShore University HealthSystem · USPrisma Health · USGeorgia State University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of South Carolina · US

Funding

Reducing disparities in birth outcomes: a randomized controlled trial on CenteringPregnancyR01HD082311 · NICHD · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI CROCKETT, AMY HAIRSTON, HEO, MOONSEONG · 2015 to 2019
$2.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD082311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe United States has persistently high rates of preterm birth and low birthweight and is characterized by significant racial disparities in these rates. Innovative group prenatal care models, such as CenteringPregnancy, have been proposed as a potential approach to improve the rates of preterm birth and low birthweight and to reduce disparities in these pregnancy outcomes.

objectiveThis study aimed to test whether participation in group prenatal care would reduce the rates of preterm birth and low birthweight compared with individual prenatal care and whether group prenatal care would reduce the racial disparity in these rates between Black and White patients. STUDY

designThis was a randomized controlled trial among medically low-risk pregnant patients at a single study site. Eligible patients were stratified by self-identified race and ethnicity and randomly allocated 1:1 between group and individual prenatal care. The primary outcomes were preterm birth at <37 weeks of gestation and low birthweight of <2500 g. The primary analysis was performed according to the intent-to-treat principle. The secondary analyses were performed according to the as-treated principle using modified intent-to-treat and per-compliance approaches. The analysis of effect modification by race and ethnicity was planned.

resultsA total of 2350 participants were enrolled, with 1176 assigned to group prenatal care and 1174 assigned to individual prenatal care. The study population included 952 Black (40.5%), 502 Hispanic (21.4%), 863 White (36.8%), and 31 "other races or ethnicity" (1.3%) participants. Group prenatal care did not reduce the rate of preterm birth (10.4% vs 8.7%; odds ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.63; P=.17) or low birthweight (9.6% vs 8.9%; odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.45; P=.62) compared with individual prenatal care. In subgroup analysis, greater attendance in prenatal care was associated with lower rates of preterm birth and low birthweight. This effect was most noticeable for the rates of low birthweight for Black participants in group care: intent to treat (51/409 [12.5%]), modified intent to treat (36/313 [11.5%]), and per compliance (20/240 [8.3%]). Although the rates of low birthweight were significantly higher for Black participants than White participants seen in individual care (adjusted odds ratio, 2.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-3.50), the difference was not significant for Black participants in group care compared with their White counterparts (adjusted odds ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-3.34).

conclusionThere was no difference in the overall rates of preterm birth or low birthweight between group and individual prenatal care. With increased participation in group prenatal care, lower rates of preterm birth and low birthweight for Black participants were observed. The role of group care models in reducing racial disparities in these birth outcomes requires further study.

Indexed as

Premature BirthBirth WeightFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornPregnancyPrenatal CareUnited StatesCenteringPregnancygroup prenatal carehealth disparitieslow birthweightprenatal carepreterm birthracial equity

Identifiers

PMID36113576
PMCPMC9729420
OpenAlexW4296163687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.