Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36113538›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2022

Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of a booster regimen of Ad26.COV2.S vaccine against COVID-19 (ENSEMBLE2): results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Karin Hardt, An Vandebosch, Jerald Sadoff, Mathieu Le Gars, Carla Truyers, David Lowson, Ilse Van Dromme, Johan Vingerhoets, Tobias Kamphuis, Gert Scheper and 8 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04614948 (A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase 3 Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Ad26.COV2.S for the Prevention of SARS-CoV-2-mediated COVID-19 in Adults Aged 18 Years and Older), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04614948 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase 3 Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Ad26.COV2.S for the Prevention of SARS-CoV-2-mediated COVID-19 in Adults Aged 18 Years and Older

TypeinterventionalSponsorJanssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V.Ran2020 to 2023Enrolled31,835ConditionsParticipants With or Without Stable Co-morbidities Associated With Progression to Severe COVID-19ArmsAd26.COV2.S, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Assessing the robustness of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy trials: systematic review and meta-analysis, January 2023.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2023
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Molecular mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 entry: implications for biomedical strategies.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Karin HardtJanssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium.
An VandeboschJanssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium.
Jerald SadoffJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, Netherlands.
Mathieu Le GarsJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, Netherlands.
Carla TruyersJanssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium.
David LowsonJanssen Research & Development, High Wycombe, UK.
Ilse Van DrommeJanssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium.
Johan VingerhoetsJanssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium.
Tobias KamphuisJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, Netherlands.
Gert ScheperJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, Netherlands.
Javier Ruiz-GuiñazúJanssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium.
Saul N FaustNIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility and Biomedical Research Centre, Southampton, UK; Faculty of Medicine and Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Christoph D SpinnerTechnical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Hanneke SchuitemakerJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, Netherlands.
Johan Van HoofJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, Netherlands.
Macaya DouoguihJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, Netherlands.
Frank StruyfJanssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium. Electronic address: fstruyf@its.jnj.com.
ENSEMBLE2 study group
Janssen (Belgium) · BEUniversity of Southampton · GBTechnical University of Munich · DENIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre · GBJanssen (Netherlands) · NLJanssen (United Kingdom) · GBHôpital Cochin · FR

Funding

Wellcome Trust 211153/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the availability of effective vaccines against COVID-19, booster vaccinations are needed to maintain vaccine-induced protection against variant strains and breakthrough infections. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine (Janssen) as primary vaccination plus a booster dose.

methodsENSEMBLE2 is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial including crossover vaccination after emergency authorisation of COVID-19 vaccines. Adults aged at least 18 years without previous COVID-19 vaccination at public and private medical practices and hospitals in Belgium, Brazil, Colombia, France, Germany, the Philippines, South Africa, Spain, the UK, and the USA were randomly assigned 1:1 via a computer algorithm to receive intramuscularly administered Ad26.COV2.S as a primary dose plus a booster dose at 2 months or two placebo injections 2 months apart. The primary endpoint was vaccine efficacy against the first occurrence of molecularly confirmed moderate to severe-critical COVID-19 with onset at least 14 days after booster vaccination, which was assessed in participants who received two doses of vaccine or placebo, were negative for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR at baseline and on serology at baseline and day 71, had no major protocol deviations, and were at risk of COVID-19 (ie, had no PCR-positive result or discontinued the study before day 71). Safety was assessed in all participants; reactogenicity, in terms of solicited local and systemic adverse events, was assessed as a secondary endpoint in a safety subset (approximately 6000 randomly selected participants). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04614948, and is ongoing.

findingsEnrolment began on Nov 16, 2020, and the primary analysis data cutoff was June 25, 2021. From 34 571 participants screened, the double-blind phase enrolled 31 300 participants, 14 492 of whom received two doses (7484 in the Ad26.COV2.S group and 7008 in the placebo group) and 11 639 of whom were eligible for inclusion in the assessment of the primary endpoint (6024 in the Ad26.COV2.S group and 5615 in the placebo group). The median (IQR) follow-up post-booster vaccination was 36·0 (15·0-62·0) days. Vaccine efficacy was 75·2% (adjusted 95% CI 54·6-87·3) against moderate to severe-critical COVID-19 (14 cases in the Ad26.COV2.S group and 52 cases in the placebo group). Most cases were due to the variants alpha (B.1.1.7) and mu (B.1.621); endpoints for the primary analysis accrued from Nov 16, 2020, to June 25, 2021, before the global dominance of delta (B.1.617.2) or omicron (B.1.1.529). The booster vaccine exhibited an acceptable safety profile. The overall frequencies of solicited local and systemic adverse events (evaluated in the safety subset, n=6067) were higher among vaccine recipients than placebo recipients after the primary and booster doses. The frequency of solicited adverse events in the Ad26.COV2.S group were similar following the primary and booster vaccinations (local adverse events, 1676 [55·6%] of 3015 vs 896 [57·5%] of 1559, respectively; systemic adverse events, 1764 [58·5%] of 3015 vs 821 [52·7%] of 1559, respectively). Solicited adverse events were transient and mostly grade 1-2 in severity.

interpretationA homologous Ad26.COV2.S booster administered 2 months after primary single-dose vaccination in adults had an acceptable safety profile and was efficacious against moderate to severe-critical COVID-19. Studies assessing efficacy against newer variants and with longer follow-up are needed.

fundingJanssen Research & Development.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesAd26COVS1AdolescentAdultAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesDouble-Blind MethodHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineSARS-CoV-2Ad26COVS1Antibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID36113538
PMCPMC9639796
OpenAlexW4295838494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.