Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36112936›Full record

ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Determinants of Cervical Cancer Screening Service Utilization Among HIV-Positive Women Aged 25 Years and Above Attending Adult ART Clinics in Southern Tigray, Ethiopia.

Lielt Gebreselassie Gebrekirstos, Meron Hadis Gebremedhin, Tiwabwork Tekalign Tafesse, Tilahun Saol Tura, Mulugeta Geremew Geleso, Tsiyon Birhanu Wube

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lielt Gebreselassie GebrekirstosDepartment of Maternity and Reproductive Health Nursing, 435721Wolaita Sodo University, Woialta, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-0317-5597
Meron Hadis GebremedhinSchool of Medicine, 435721Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita, Southern Ethiopia.
Tiwabwork Tekalign TafesseSchool of Nursing, 435721Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita, Southern Ethiopia.
Tilahun Saol TuraSchool of Nursing, 435721Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita, Southern Ethiopia.
Mulugeta Geremew GelesoDepartment of Statistics, College of Natural and Computational Science, 442733Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-3157-8353
Tsiyon Birhanu WubeSchool of Nursing, 245850Aksum University, Aksum, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0001-7465-4697

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer and human immunodeficiency virus prevention are public health priorities in Ethiopia. Despite cervical cancer being preventable with the Human Papilloma Virus vaccine and cervical cancer screening, HIV-infected women still have a low rate of screening, and data are scarce in this country. Thus, this study aimed to assess the prevalence of cervical cancer screening service utilization and associated factors among HIV-positive women in Southern Tigray, Ethiopia, 2018.

methodsA facility-based cross-sectional study was performed from March 1st to May 15th, 2018. We recruited 465 HIV-positive women using a systematic random sampling method. Data were collected using a pre-tested structured interviewer-administered questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, followed by multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed. Crude odds ratios, adjusted odds ratios, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported.

resultsIn this study, only 8% of HIV-positive women were screened for cervical cancer. The most frequently cited barrier by participants to getting screened was feeling healthy 282 (65.9%). Multiparity {AOR = 4.12, 95% CI = (1.70, 9.95)}, provider recommendation to get screened {AOR = 3.20, 95%CI = (1.34, 7.65)}, having good knowledge {AOR = 4.33, 95%CI = (1.66-11.29)}, and high perceived susceptibility for cervical cancer {AOR = 3.10, 95% CI = (1.31-7.33)} were the factors significantly associated with cervical cancer screening service utilization.

conclusionsThe prevalence of cervical cancer screening service utilization was quite low. Provider's recommendation to get screened, multiparity, knowledge, and perceived susceptibility were factors strongly associated with the service utilization. There is a need of routine counseling of health care providers for all HIV-positive women to get screened. Women's lack of knowledge also needs to be addressed by informing every HIV-positive woman that they are more susceptible to cervical cancer, and that screening is critical to fighting against the disease.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerEthiopiaFemaleHumansPapillomavirus Vaccinescancer screeningcervical cancerEthiopiaHIV-positivewomen

Identifiers

PMID36112936
PMCPMC9478700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.