Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36112770›Full record

Observational studySurgical innovation2023

Implementation of an Innovative Technology Called the OR Black Box: A Feasibility Study.

Kjestine Emilie Møller, Jette Led Sørensen, Martha Krogh Topperzer, Christian Koerner, Bent Ottesen, Mikkel Rosendahl, Teodor Grantcharov, Jeanett Strandbygaard

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Surgical innovation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07396675 (Improving Postoperative Debriefings), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07396675 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Improving Postoperative Debriefings: the Added Value of Operating Room Black Box Supported Debriefings and Their Effect on Healthcare Professionals Perceived Effectiveness and Psychological Safety.

TypeinterventionalSponsorORNND - Operating Room Nurse Network DenmarkRan2026 to 2027Enrolled135ConditionsStress, Resilience, Psychological Safety, Burnout, Healthcare WorkersArmsDebriefing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kjestine Emilie MøllerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 53146Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2623-7562
Jette Led SørensenJuliane Marie Centre, Children's Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Martha Krogh TopperzerJuliane Marie Centre, Children's Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christian KoernerDepartment of Improvement and Digitalization, 53146Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bent OttesenJuliane Marie Centre, Children's Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mikkel RosendahlDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 53146Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Teodor GrantcharovDepartment of General Surgery, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jeanett StrandbygaardDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 53146Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Operating RoomsFeasibility StudiesHumansgynecologic laparoscopysurgical educationsurgical oncology

Identifiers

PMID36112770
PMCPMC9925891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.