ArticleNursing open2023
Mapping research findings on change implementation in nursing practice: A scoping literature review.
Article in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Practical Implications of the Organizational Commitment Model in Healthcare: The Case of Nurses.Journal of nursing management · 2024Pooled it
- Implementation of the Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario Best Practice Guidelines for delirium-specific recommendations in a digital practice setting at Humber River Health, Canada.International journal of nursing sciences · 2026Article
- Developing information material to support the assessment of palliative care needs in dementia: a qualitative participatory approach.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of co-created nursing innovations in a Dutch university hospital.JBI evidence implementation · 2025Article
- Prioritization decision-making of care in nursing homes: A qualitative study.Nursing ethics · 2025Article
- Determinants of Evidence Implementation by Nurses: #Evidencer Model for the Use of Evidence-Based Practice (#EvidencerMUSEBP)-A Structural Equation Model.Journal of nursing management · 2024Article
- Mapping research findings on change implementation in nursing practice: A scoping literature review.Nursing open · 2023Article
- Improving the Promotion of Older Adults' Physical Activity in Institutional Long-Term Care: Participatory Action Research.Global qualitative nursing researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe aim of this study was to map the diverse factors impacting change implementation in nursing practices and investigate different implementation strategies.
designScoping literature review following PRISMA-ScR extension.
methodsData were collected from PubMed, Ebsco, Scopus and ScienceDirect databases from 1990 onwards. Only English peer-reviewed studies reporting an implementation of change in nursing practice were included. Of 9,954 studies, 425 abstracts were scanned and 98 full-text articles were screened. Finally, 28 studies were selected.
resultsA multifaceted approach, with a tailored intervention, was the most effective implementation strategy. Most identified factors were considered systematic, for example resource availability, leadership and knowledge. However, others related to local social and material context were identified in fewer number of studies. These seem to be operational elements for implementation processes. Both types of factors are essential and must be considered for successful implementation.
conclusionWe advocate the development of framework including systematic factors and which capture the local context flexibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.