Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36112499›Full record

ReviewEndocrine connections2022

A critical evaluation of the EU-virtual consultation platform (CPMS) within the European Reference Network on Rare Endocrine Conditions.

E K White, I V Wagner, C van Beuzekom, V Iotova, S F Ahmed, O Hiort, A M Pereira

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrine connections, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. European multidisciplinary tumor boards support cross-border networking and increase treatment options for patients with rare gynecological tumors.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

E K WhiteDivision of Endocrinology and Centre for Endocrine Tumors, Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5669-5388
I V WagnerDepartment of Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
C van BeuzekomDivision of Endocrinology and Centre for Endocrine Tumors, Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
V IotovaDivision of Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4160-1200
S F AhmedOffice for Rare Conditions, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0689-5549
O HiortDepartment of Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
A M PereiraFaculty of Medicine Division 2, Internal Medicine Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2017, the European Commission installed 24 European Reference Networks (ERNs) for different categories of rare and complex conditions to facilitate cross-border health care via virtual case consultations in a secure Clinical Patient Management System (CPMS). The ERN for rare endocrine conditions (Endo-ERN) previously reviewed the CPMS, in which they detailed the difficulties physicians encountered with the system and proposed solutions to these that should enable the system to be used to a greater extent. This paper will further the endeavor of the first by performing a critical evaluation of the CPMS, assessing how these suggested improvements have been implemented, and if these have affected the usage of the system. The evaluation involves an assessment of CPMS usage statistics since its conception that takes into consideration the technical updates and the external factors that may have affected these, including data from a review survey following a training workshop for our new healthcare providers (HCPs) added in January 2022. It appears that the improvements made to the system since the first review, in particular the implementation of the Operational Helpdesk, have had a positive effect in increasing CPMS membership; however, the regular usage of the system continues to fluctuate. Several suggestions are made on how to further facilitate the use of CPMS by our members both individually and network-wide, by integrating CPMS activities with other network initiatives and further integrating these into national health care systems as well as looking for ways to measure patient satisfaction from the CPMS discussions outcomes.

Indexed as

CPMSEndo-ERNrare diseasesvirtual consultations

Identifiers

PMID36112499
PMCPMC9641765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.