Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36112400›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

Waiting Lists for Psychotherapy and Provider Attitudes Toward Low-Intensity Treatments as Potential Interventions: Survey Study.

Allison Peipert, Anne C Krendl, Lorenzo Lorenzo-Luaces

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Allison PeipertDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2947-5531
Anne C KrendlDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0135-5308
Lorenzo Lorenzo-LuacesDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8882-0243
Indiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Management: Improving Submissions and Study Conduct in the Human Subjects Research Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002529 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOE, SHARON M, WIEHE, SARAH ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2022
$27.2M
Translating Measures of Visual Experience to Children with Autism and Down SyndromeKL2TR002530 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI ROBB, SHERI L · 2018 to 2022
$4.8M
Understanding how social connectedness protects older adults' cognitive health: the role of social cognitionR01AG070931 · NIA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI KRENDL, ANNE CATHERINE, PERRY, BREA LOUISE · 2020 to 2024
$3.6M
Training in Clinical Translational Science: Maximizing the Public Health ImpactT32MH103213 · NIMH · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM P HETRICK · 2015 to 2026
$3.4M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002530NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002529NIA NIH HHS R01 AG070931NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH103213
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommon mental disorders, including depression and anxiety, are leading causes of disability worldwide. Digital mental health interventions, such as web-based self-help and other low-intensity treatments (LITs) that are not digital (eg, bibliotherapy), have the potential to reach many individuals by circumventing common barriers present in traditional mental health care. It is unclear how often LITs are used in clinical practice, or whether providers would be interested in their use for treatment waiting lists.

objectiveThe aims of this study were to (1) describe current practices for treatment waiting lists, (2) describe providers' attitudes toward digital and nondigital LITs for patients on a waiting list, and (3) explore providers' willingness to use digital and nondigital LITs and their decisions to learn about them.

methodsWe surveyed 141 practicing mental health care providers (eg, therapists and psychologists) and provided an opportunity for them to learn about LITs.

resultsMost participants reported keeping a waiting list. Few participants reported currently recommending digital or nondigital LITs, though most were willing to use at least one for patients on their waiting list. Attitudes toward digital and nondigital LITs were neutral to positive. Guided digital and nondigital LITs were generally perceived to be more effective but less accessible, and unguided interventions were perceived to be less effective but more accessible. Most participants selected to access additional information on LITs, with the most popular being web-based self-help.

conclusionsResults suggest providers are currently not recommending LITs for patients on treatment waiting lists but would be willing to recommend them. Future work should explore barriers and facilitators to implementing digital and nondigital LITs for patients on treatment waiting lists.

Indexed as

anxietyattitudebehavior therapybibliotherapycare providerCBTcognitive behavioral therapydepressiondigital healthdigital interventiondigital mental healtheHealthhealth care deliveryhealth care professionalhealth systemlow-intensity interventionmental disordermental healthperceptionpsychotherapyself-helpsupport groupsurveywaiting listweb-based intervention

Identifiers

PMID36112400
PMCPMC9526124
OpenAlexW4292601571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.