Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36112255›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2022

Molecular characterization of Rickettsia spp., Bartonella spp., and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in hard ticks collected from wild animals in Benin, West Africa.

Roland Eric Yessinou, Safiou Adehan, Georges Codjo Hedegbetan, Rudi Cassini, Samuel Elias Mantip, Souaïbou Farougou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Tick-Borne Diseases of Humans and Animals in West Africa.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Roland Eric YessinouCommunicable Diseases Research Unit (URMAT), University of Abomey-Calavi (UAC), 01, PO Box: 2009, Cotonou, Benin. eric.yessinou@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1743-318X
Safiou AdehanCommunicable Diseases Research Unit (URMAT), University of Abomey-Calavi (UAC), 01, PO Box: 2009, Cotonou, Benin.
Georges Codjo HedegbetanRegional Center for Research and Education for Integrated Development (CREDI-ONG), BP 471, Abomey-Calavi, Bénin.
Rudi CassiniDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, Legnaro, (PD), Italy.
Samuel Elias MantipVirology Division, National Veterinary Research Institute, Vom, P.M.B 0001, Plateau State, Nigeria.
Souaïbou FarougouCommunicable Diseases Research Unit (URMAT), University of Abomey-Calavi (UAC), 01, PO Box: 2009, Cotonou, Benin.
Université d'Abomey-Calavi · BJNational Veterinary Research Institute · NGUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tick and tick-borne pathogens constitute a growing veterinary and public health concern around the world. Ticks are considered natural reservoirs for tick-borne related pathogens and are equally responsible for the spread of infections in animals as well as humans. In this study, the presence of Rickettsia, Bartonella, and Anaplasma phagocytophilum was investigated in hard ticks collected from reptiles, birds, and wild mammalian animals. The sample collection was carried out between December 2020 and September 2021. Adult ticks (male and female) were collected from wild animals in six districts of southern Benin. Molecular analysis was used to verify the presence of pathogens in all the ticks collected from wild animals. A total of 504 ticks were collected and grouped into 115 different tick pools. The PCR analysis detected 19 out of 115 tick pools which turn out positive for Rickettsia spp. and 9/115 tick pools positive for Bartonella spp., while Anaplasma phagocytophilum DNA was not detected in any tick. Several of the tick species collected from our studied reptiles/wild mammalian animals could be potential sources of zoonotic pathogens when subjected to further investigation. Therefore, stringent attention should be established for tick infestation of reptiles/wild mammalian animals in order to put in place proper control and prevention measures for tick-borne diseases in the wild, which could serve as reservoirs in the infestation of domestic animals/humans in the event of any possible contact.

Indexed as

Anaplasma phagocytophilumBartonellaIxodidaeRickettsiaTicksAfrica, WesternAnimalsAnimals, WildBeninFemaleHumansMaleMammalsEpidemiological surveillancePublic healthVector-borne diseasesWest AfricaZoonotic pathogens

Identifiers

PMID36112255
OpenAlexW4296027767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.