Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36112200›Full record

ReviewJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2022

Organization of the parallel antennal-lobe tracts in the moth.

Jonas Hansen Kymre, Xi Chu, Elena Ian, Bente Gunnveig Berg

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonas Hansen KymreChemosensory Lab, Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. jonas.h.kymre@ntnu.no.
Xi ChuChemosensory Lab, Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Elena IanChemosensory Lab, Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Bente Gunnveig BergChemosensory Lab, Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NO

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd 287052 to B.G. Berg
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The olfactory pathways of the insect brain have been studied comprehensively for more than 40 years, yet the last decade has included a particularly large accumulation of new information relating to this system's structure. In moths, sharp intracellular recording and staining has been used to elucidate the anatomy and physiology of output neurons from the primary olfactory center, the antennal lobe. This review concentrates on the connection patterns characterizing these projection neurons, which follow six separate antennal-lobe tracts. In addition to highlighting the connections between functionally distinct glomerular clusters and higher-order olfactory neuropils, we discuss how parallel tracts in the male convey distinct features of the social signals released by conspecific and heterospecific females. Finally, we consider the current state of knowledge regarding olfactory processing in the moth's protocerebrum and make suggestions as to how the information concerning antennal-lobe output may be used to design future studies.

Indexed as

MothsAnimalsBrainFemaleInterneuronsMaleNeuronsOlfactory PathwaysAntennal-lobe tractsElectrophysiologyInsect olfactionNeuroanatomyProjection neurons

Identifiers

PMID36112200
PMCPMC9734247
OpenAlexW4296029224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.